%PDF-1.6 % 1 0 obj<> endobj 2 0 obj[/PDF/Text] endobj 3 0 obj<> endobj 4 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 5 0 obj<> endobj 6 0 obj<> endobj 7 0 obj<> endobj 8 0 obj<> endobj 9 0 obj<> endobj 10 0 obj<>stream BT 108 637.44 TD 0 0 0 rg /F0 12 Tf 0 Tc 0 Tw ( ) Tj 183.84 0 TD /F1 12 Tf (CHAPTER I) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -248.64 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 172.8 0 TD (Introduction) Tj 86.4 0 TD /F0 12 Tf ( ) Tj -259.2 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD /F1 12 Tf (The process of screening and identifying children with ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (Auditory Processing Disorders \(APDs\), previously called ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Central Auditory Processing Disorders \(CAPDs\), continues to ) Tj T* (be a debated topic in the field of audiology. According t) Tj 410.4 0 TD (o ) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (Hall \(1999\), \223the term CAPD is used to describe a deficit in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the perception or complete analysis of auditory information ) Tj T* (due to central auditory nervous system dysfunction, usually ) Tj T* (at the level of the cerebral cortex\224 \(p. 35\). Jerger and ) Tj T* (Musiek \(2000\) st) Tj 115.2 0 TD (ate that this deficit in information ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (processing is specific to the auditory modality. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (children diagnosed with APD have normal peripheral hearing. ) Tj T* (However, they are often unable to process certain aspects of ) Tj T* (auditory information correctly. Much of the c) Tj 324 0 TD (urrent debate ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (centers on which tests are appropriate and should be used in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the screening and diagnosis of APD.) Tj 252 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (Many tests and procedures have been recommended for ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (screening and diagnosing APD. According to the 1996 ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (consensus statement by the American Spee) Tj 288 0 TD (ch) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (Language) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (Hearing ) Tj ET endstream endobj 11 0 obj 1763 endobj 12 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 13 0 obj<> endobj 14 0 obj<> endobj 15 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (2) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (Association \(ASHA\), the central auditory processing system ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (is responsible for six behavioral processes. These six ) Tj T* (processes are sound localization and lateralization, ) Tj T* (auditory discrimination, auditory pattern recognition, ) Tj T* (temporal aspec) Tj 100.8 0 TD (ts of audition, auditory performance ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (decrements with competing acoustic signals, and auditory ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (performance decrements with degraded acoustic signals. To be ) Tj T* (diagnosed with APD, a child must exhibit a deficit in one or ) Tj T* (more of these processes \(ASHA, 1996\). AS) Tj 288 0 TD (HA recommended five ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (behavioral auditory test measures for these six areas. As ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Schow, Seikel, Chermak, and Berent \(2000\) point out in a ) Tj T* (follow) Tj 43.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (up article, there is not a definite correspondence ) Tj -50.4 -27.84 TD (between all six behavioral processes and the five ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (recommended t) Tj 93.6 0 TD (esting measures of ASHA. They recommended ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (behavioral tests that included a monaural task, a pattern or ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (temporal ordering task, and two binaural tasks that involve ) Tj T* (integration and separation. These four tasks are thought to ) Tj T* (relate to three important behavio) Tj 237.6 0 TD (ral processing areas ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (\(monaural tasks, binaural tasks, and pattern recognition ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tasks\).) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -14.4 -27.84 TD (Jerger and Musiek \(2000\) reported on a consensus ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (conference \(Bruton\) of 14 audiologists that discussed, among ) Tj ET endstream endobj 16 0 obj 1894 endobj 17 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 18 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (3) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (other APD issues, the diagnosis of APD for school children.) Tj 424.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -424.8 -27.84 TD (This conference recommended a minimal behavioral test ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (battery as well as the use of electro/physiological/acoustic ) Tj T* (tests and neuroimaging studies. Chermak \(2001\), who ) Tj T* (participated in the Bruton conference, summarized the ) Tj T* (recommendations there and suggeste) Tj 244.8 0 TD (d that the behavioral test ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (battery should contain at least one test in three areas: 1\) ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (temporal processing, 2\) binaural processing, and 3\) monaural ) Tj T* (low) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (redundancy speech recognition. In addition, she ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (recommended that although APD is diagnosed by audiologis) Tj 403.2 0 TD (ts ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (after an extensive evaluation) Tj 208.8 0 TD /F0 12 Tf (, ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf (a \223comprehensive evaluation ) Tj -223.2 -27.84 TD (requires a multi) Tj 115.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (disciplinary team approach\224 \(p. 12\). She ) Tj -122.4 -27.84 TD (recommended the inclusion of speech) Tj 252 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (language pathologists, ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (psychologists, and educators in the evaluation process. ) Tj 403.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (Katz et al. \(2002\) ) Tj 136.8 0 TD (supported the behavioral tests of ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (the Bruton group but disagreed with the use of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (electro/physiological/acoustic tests and neuroimaging for ) Tj T* (the general population because they felt that these measures ) Tj T* (were unrealistically expensive and time consuming. They ) Tj 403.2 0 TD (also ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (stated that research does not confirm that children with APD ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (are significantly different in ) Tj T* (electro/physiological/acoustic measures from children who do ) Tj ET endstream endobj 19 0 obj 2115 endobj 20 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 21 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (4) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (not have APD. In addition, little is known about imaging. In ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (response, Jerger and Musiek \(2002\) st) Tj 266.4 0 TD (ated that, \223if we are ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (ever going to have a gold standard for APD, it will probably ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (be in the form of electrophysiological measures\224 \(p. 20\). ) Tj T* (Very little has been done so far on electrophysiological ) Tj T* (measures of APD while most work has focused on behavioral ) Tj T* (tests.) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (In an attempt to provide a reliable behavioral test ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (battery through the use of factor analysis, Domitz and Schow ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(2000\), administered a battery of APD tests to school) Tj 381.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (aged ) Tj -388.8 -27.84 TD (children. They named their test battery the Multiple ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Auditory Processing Ass) Tj 165.6 0 TD (essment \(MAPA\). While they felt the ) Tj -165.6 -27.84 TD (MAPA was an appropriate test, tapping into several important ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (areas from the 1996 ASHA guidelines, the ceiling effect was ) Tj T* (occurring with some of the tests and especially with older ) Tj T* (children.) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD (Recently, a revised Beta I) Tj 187.2 0 TD (II version of the MAPA has ) Tj -223.2 -27.84 TD (been developed and recorded on compact disc. The Beta III ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (MAPA includes test information for a Form A and Form B ) Tj T* (version of the test. The Beta III MAPA has all of the same ) Tj T* (tests as the original MAPA plus four more. These behavior) Tj 410.4 0 TD (al ) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (tests are organized into three areas \(monaural, binaural, ) Tj ET endstream endobj 22 0 obj 1952 endobj 23 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 24 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (5) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (and temporal patterns\) as recommended by Chermak and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(monotic, diotic, and dichotic\) as advised by the Bruton ) Tj T* (group. In addition, the tests that were prone to the ceiling ) Tj T* (effect were modified so ) Tj 172.8 0 TD (the tasks would be more difficult. ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (The specific modifications to the tests will be described in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the literature review \(Appendix A\).) Tj 252 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 25 0 obj 664 endobj 26 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 27 0 obj<> endobj 28 0 obj<> endobj 29 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (6) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD ( ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 151.2 0 TD (Research Questions) Tj 129.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (There were two research questions asked in this ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (study.) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -27.84 TD (1) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Are form A and form B of the four original tes) Tj 331.2 0 TD (ts within ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (the Beta III MAPA \(mSAAT, PP, DD, CS\) and two of the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (experimental tests \(SINCA, DP\) equivalent tests based ) Tj T* (on t) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tests, fmax, and Pearson correlations?) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -345.6 -27.84 TD (2) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Are the four modified tests appropriately designed to ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (overcome the ceiling effects and produce ) Tj 295.2 0 TD (reasonable ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (means and standard deviations?) Tj 216 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 30 0 obj 1198 endobj 31 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 32 0 obj<> endobj 33 0 obj<>stream BT 108 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 180 0 TD /F1 12 Tf (CHAPTER II) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj 180 0 TD ( ) Tj -432 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 176.64 0 TD (Methodology) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -255.84 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -27.84 TD (The purpose of this study was to determine if both A ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (and B forms of the Beta III Multiple Auditory Processing ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Assessment \(MAPA\) tests are equivalent. Improving the ) Tj T* (revised MAPA will al) Tj 144 0 TD (low audiologists to evaluate three ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (important behavioral test areas as described in the 1996 ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (ASHA guidelines and at the Bruton Conference. ) Tj 331.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Procedures) Tj 72 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -27.84 TD (Participants were obtained by working with the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (Blackfoot/Snake River Ĵý school district audiologist. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (I) Tj 7.2 0 TD (nitially, all students in the selected classrooms received ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (a consent form to be taken home to the parents explaining ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the purpose of the study \(Appendix C\). In addition, parents ) Tj T* (were asked to complete a twelve) Tj 223.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (item checklist based on the ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (work of Shiffman \(1) Tj 136.8 0 TD (999\) and Chermack, Somers, and Seikel ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (\(1998\) to give information on their child\222s attention and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (auditory behavior \(Appendix D\). Teachers were also asked to ) Tj T* (complete the same scale for each child participating in the ) Tj ET endstream endobj 34 0 obj 1693 endobj 35 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 36 0 obj<>stream BT 72 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (study as a verification measure for the ) Tj 288 0 TD (parental report. ) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (All children who returned the consent form were told ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (that they could refuse participation later, despite parental ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (consent. All children, after completion of the test, were ) Tj T* (asked if they would be willing to be retested. All testing ) Tj T* (was ad) Tj 43.2 0 TD (ministered by graduate) Tj 158.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (level clinicians, certified ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (audiologists, or trained assistants according to ASHA ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (guidelines and the guidelines for scoring the original MAPA. ) Tj T* (The children returning the consent forms who agreed to ) Tj T* (participate were tested in two test) Tj 252 0 TD (ing sessions. ) Tj 108 0 TD ( ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (During the first test session, the children received a ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (hearing screening consisting of pure tones, tympanometry, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (and OAEs. To pass the hearing screening, children had ) Tj T* (thresholds of 20 dB HL or better at 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. ) Tj T* (In addition,) Tj 86.4 0 TD ( immittance testing needed to show compliance ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (greater than .2 ml. If this was not shown, the child was ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (required to pass the hearing screening at 250 and 500 Hz. ) Tj 417.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (A calibrated Maico \(MA39\) portable audiometer with ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (TDH39 headphones, an Earscan immittance scr) Tj 309.6 0 TD (eener, and a ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (portable Maico Ero) Tj 129.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (scan otoacoustic emissions screener were ) Tj ET endstream endobj 37 0 obj 1776 endobj 38 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 39 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 424.8 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (9) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (used to screen each subject\222s hearing and middle ear status. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (All equipment was calibrated following ANSI guidelines. ) Tj T* (Daily calibrations on the tympanometer were conducted as ) Tj T* (well as b) Tj 64.8 0 TD (iological listening checks on the audiometer and CD ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (players. ) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (Portable Lenoxx Sound Model CD) Tj 216 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (87 compact digital audio ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (disc players with digital Koss \(UR15\) or Optimus Nova) Tj 381.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (44 ) Tj -388.8 -27.84 TD (stereo headphones were used during APD testing. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (administering clinicians use) Tj 201.6 0 TD (d monitoring earbuds or ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (headphones while conducting the testing. The auditory ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (processing test was delivered to the subject at an ) Tj T* (approximate level of 50 dB HL. Following the procedures of ) Tj T* (Domitz \(1997\) and Shiffman \(1999\), and to ensure delivery ) Tj T* (consistenc) Tj 72 0 TD (y, the volume control of the CD player was fixed ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (at 75 dB SPL throughout testing to approximate a 50) Tj 367.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (55 dB HL ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (presentation level as recommended. Since the monitoring ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (headphones/earbuds were used, this level was established ) Tj T* (with the testing headphones and t) Tj 237.6 0 TD (he additional set of phones ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (attached to the CD player through a Y) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (cord.) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (After the initial hearing screening, each participant ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (was tested individually for a 30) Tj 230.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (minute test battery, using ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (form A. At the end of the first session, the children ) Tj ET endstream endobj 40 0 obj 2071 endobj 41 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 42 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (10) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (received McDonal) Tj 115.2 0 TD (d\222s coupons. The following six tests, shown ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (in the order they are recorded on the CD, were administered. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (The tests were administered in the order recorded on the CD. ) Tj T* (However, the starting order of administration varied between ) Tj T* (the children to control for t) Tj 208.8 0 TD (hreats of validity involving ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (subject fatigue. This procedure was followed for both forms ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (A and B \(first and second sessions\).) Tj 259.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -223.2 -27.84 TD (3) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Monaural selective auditory attention test \(mSAAT\)) Tj 360 0 TD ( ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (4) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Pitch patterns \(PP\)) Tj 136.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (5) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Dichotic digits \(DD\)) Tj 144 0 TD ( ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (6) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Competing sentences \(CS\)) Tj 172.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (7) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Duration pat) Tj 86.4 0 TD (terns \(DP\)) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -194.4 -27.84 TD (8) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Speech in Noise for Children and Adults \(SINCA\)) Tj 338.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (Since this data was going to be collapsed with a ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (companion study, all the children were given two other ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (experimental tests, a Gap Detection task and the Quick Tap ) Tj T* (\(described in a companion study\), ) Tj 244.8 0 TD (as part of the form A ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (testing procedure.) Tj 129.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (The second session was completed during the following ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (week \(elapsed time was 7) Tj 172.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (10 days between tests\) with the ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (children being tested individually for 30 minutes using the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (same six tests but from form B. About half o) Tj 316.8 0 TD (f the sample \(25 ) Tj ET endstream endobj 43 0 obj 2522 endobj 44 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 45 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (11) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (children\) were also given the experimental Quick Tap and Gap ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Detection tasks. These two tasks do not have multiple forms. ) Tj T* (The reward for the second session was either more McDonald\222s ) Tj T* (coupons or a selection of stickers or small treats.) Tj 367.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (All) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( instructions for the tests were pre) Tj 259.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (recorded on the ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (CD. Therefore, the clinicians were responsible for ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (monitoring the CD player through the additional set of ) Tj T* (headphones/earbuds, ensuring correct placement of the ) Tj T* (testing headphones, clarifying instructions) Tj 309.6 0 TD ( when requested ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (by the child, and scoring each response as correct or ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (incorrect. The CD player was paused only during school ) Tj T* (disruptions, breaks for the children, and for the ) Tj T* (instruction clarification. It was not paused to allow more ) Tj T* (time for the children ) Tj 158.4 0 TD (to respond.) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (The answer sheets were coded to ensure confidentiality. ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (To ensure measurement reliability, the researcher trained ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the clinicians prior to beginning the testing and observed ) Tj T* (each clinician at least once during the research period. The ) Tj T* (researcher) Tj 72 0 TD ( also double checked all final score tabulations ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (to ensure accuracy.) Tj 136.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Instrumentation) Tj 108 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD (The instrument used included the original four tests ) Tj ET endstream endobj 46 0 obj 1917 endobj 47 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 48 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (12) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (from the Beta III MAPA as revised, using both forms A and B. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Four additional experimental tests were also included i) Tj 396 0 TD (n the ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (test battery with two evaluated for equivalency in this ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (study. The MAPA will eventually consist of tests in each of ) Tj T* (the areas of monaural, binaural, and temporal processing ) Tj T* (tasks. The determination of the tests to be included depends ) Tj T* (on the results o) Tj 115.2 0 TD (f this study and a companion study. The ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (monaural tests were the monaural Selective Auditory ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Attention Test \(mSAAT\), and the Speech in Noise for Children ) Tj T* (and Adults \(SINCA\). The binaural tests were the dichotic ) Tj T* (digits \(DD\), and competing sentences \(CS\). The) Tj 331.2 0 TD ( temporal ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (tests included pitch patterns \(PP\) and duration patterns ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(DP\). The results from two experimental tests, forms A and B ) Tj T* (of the SINCA and DP, a monaural and a temporal task, are ) Tj T* (included in this study. The Quick Tap test and the Gap ) Tj T* (Detection test w) Tj 115.2 0 TD (ere used also but evaluated in the other ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (study. The tests are on a compact disc \(CD\) recorded by ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Auditec, a major supplier and developer of auditory tests in ) Tj T* (St. Louis, Missouri. All tests are preceded by formal, ) Tj T* (recorded instructions and coincide with the) Tj 309.6 0 TD ( answer sheets. ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (The administering clinicians recorded each test based on the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (subject response or non) Tj 165.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (response. Answer sheets for forms A ) Tj ET endstream endobj 49 0 obj 1953 endobj 50 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 51 0 obj<> endobj 52 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (13) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (and B appear in Appendix B.) Tj 194.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 53 0 obj 265 endobj 54 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 55 0 obj<>stream BT 72 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 176.64 0 TD (CHAPTER III) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -255.84 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 136.8 0 TD (Results and Discussion) Tj 158.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -295.2 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD (To review, there were two research questions aske) Tj 352.8 0 TD (d in ) Tj -388.8 -27.84 TD (this study.) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD (9) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 21.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Are form A and form B of the four original tests within ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the Beta III MAPA \(mSAAT, PP, DD, CS\) and two of the ) Tj T* (experimental tests \(SINCA, DP\) equivalent tests based ) Tj T* (on t) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tests, fmax, and Pearson correlations?) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -345.6 -27.84 TD (10) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Are the four modified tests appr) Tj 230.4 0 TD (opriately designed to ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (overcome the ceiling effects and produce reasonable ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (means and standard deviations?) Tj 216 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (This section discusses the noise level measures and ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (participants. Mean scores, standard deviations, Pearson ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (correlations, fmax, and paired t) Tj 230.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test resul) Tj 72 0 TD (ts were used to ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (examine the equivalency between forms and examine any ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (ceiling effects. In addition, a discussion of the mean ) Tj T* (scores, standard deviations, Pearson correlations, fmax, and ) Tj T* (t) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test results are given when tests are examined in combined ) Tj -14.4 -27.84 TD (groups of) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( monaural, binaural, and temporal tasks.) Tj 288 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 56 0 obj 1904 endobj 57 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 58 0 obj<>stream BT 108 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F0 12 Tf 0 Tw (Noise Levels) Tj 86.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -50.4 -27.84 TD /F1 12 Tf (Testing was completed in a quiet room provided by the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (school. The rooms met the noise) Tj 223.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (level requirements ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (recommended by ASHA for the 500) Tj 223.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (4000 Hz range which is that ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (noise should be less than 46 dB at 5) Tj 259.2 0 TD (00 Hz, 49.5 dB at 1 kHz, ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (54.5 dB at 2 kHz, and 62 dB at 4 kHz \(ASHA, 1997\). Ambient ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (noise was monitored using the Quest) Tj 252 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (188 sound level meter ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (and rechecked when noise levels changed noticeably. At no ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (time were measurements taken that exceeded the ASHA ) Tj T* (guid) Tj 28.8 0 TD (elines. Table 1 shows the recorded noise measurements ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (for each school compared to the 1997 ASHA guidelines.) Tj 381.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (Table 1. Recorded noise measurements for each school) Tj 374.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -368.16 -23.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.8 -11.52 TD (Hz) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 52.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 -11.52 TD (ASHA) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (School 1) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (School 2) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 298.56 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 299.04 0.48 0.48 re f 108 299.04 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 298.56 0.48 0.48 re f 215.52 299.04 0.48 0.48 re f 216 299.04 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 298.56 0.48 0.48 re f 323.52 299.04 0.48 0.48 re f 324 299.04 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 298.56 0.48 0.48 re f 431.52 299.04 0.48 0.48 re f 432 299.04 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 298.56 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 299.04 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 261.12 0.48 37.44 re f 215.52 261.12 0.48 37.44 re f 323.52 261.12 0.48 37.44 re f 431.52 261.12 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 261.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 254.88 TD ( ) Tj 36.96 -11.52 TD (500) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 49.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 -11.52 TD (46 dB) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (33.6 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (39.0 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 260.16 0.48 0.96 re f 108 260.64 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 260.16 0.48 0.96 re f 216 260.64 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 260.16 0.48 0.96 re f 324 260.64 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 260.16 0.48 0.96 re f 432 260.64 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 260.16 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 222.72 0.48 37.44 re f 215.52 222.72 0.48 37.44 re f 323.52 222.72 0.48 37.44 re f 431.52 222.72 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 222.72 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 216.48 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 -11.52 TD (1000) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (49.5 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (25.9 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (32.5 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 221.76 0.48 0.96 re f 108 222.24 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 221.76 0.48 0.96 re f 216 222.24 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 221.76 0.48 0.96 re f 324 222.24 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 221.76 0.48 0.96 re f 432 222.24 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 221.76 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 184.32 0.48 37.44 re f 215.52 184.32 0.48 37.44 re f 323.52 184.32 0.48 37.44 re f 431.52 184.32 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 184.32 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 178.08 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 -11.52 TD (2000) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (54.5 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (21.6 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (27.0 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 183.36 0.48 0.96 re f 108 183.84 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 183.36 0.48 0.96 re f 216 183.84 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 183.36 0.48 0.96 re f 324 183.84 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 183.36 0.48 0.96 re f 432 183.84 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 183.36 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 145.92 0.48 37.44 re f 215.52 145.92 0.48 37.44 re f 323.52 145.92 0.48 37.44 re f 431.52 145.92 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 145.92 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 139.68 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 -11.52 TD (4000) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 -11.52 TD (62 dB) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (19.2 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 35.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (20.6 dB) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 144.96 0.48 0.96 re f 108 145.44 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 144.96 0.48 0.96 re f 216 145.44 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 144.96 0.48 0.96 re f 324 145.44 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 144.96 0.48 0.96 re f 432 145.44 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 144.96 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 107.52 0.48 37.44 re f 107.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 108 107.04 107.52 0.48 re f 215.52 107.52 0.48 37.44 re f 215.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 216 107.04 107.52 0.48 re f 323.52 107.52 0.48 37.44 re f 323.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 324 107.04 107.52 0.48 re f 431.52 107.52 0.48 37.44 re f 431.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 432 107.04 107.52 0.48 re f 539.52 107.52 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 107.04 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 96.48 TD /F0 12 Tf (Participants) Tj 86.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 59 0 obj 5144 endobj 60 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 61 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (16) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Parent permission forms \(see Appendix C\) and auditory ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (behavior scales \(Appendix D\) were delivered to an Ĵý ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (elementary school in both the Blackfoot and Snake River ) Tj T* (school di) Tj 64.8 0 TD (stricts. Principals and teachers of the third and ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (fifth grade classrooms were contacted in advance and had ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (agreed to participate in the study \(see Appendix E\). The ) Tj T* (children were informed about the testing and were asked to ) Tj T* (have their parents sign the perm) Tj 230.4 0 TD (ission slips and fill out ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (the questionnaires. Demographic information gathered from ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the parent, child, teacher, and school records included age, ) Tj T* (gender, handedness, and whether the child had been diagnosed ) Tj T* (with either attention) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (deficit hyperactivity disord) Tj 201.6 0 TD (er, speech ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (or language problems, learning disabilities, IQ deficit or ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difficulties with math, reading, or writing. ) Tj 324 0 TD ( ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (Fifty children returned forms and volunteered to be ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (subjects. Of these, two were eliminated after the data ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (collection based on cognitive imp) Tj 237.6 0 TD (airment and age ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (considerations. The results for forty) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (eight children are ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (included in this study. There were 23 participants from one ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (school and 25 participants from the other. Twenty) Tj 352.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (five ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (children in the third grade participated in the study and 23 ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (childre) Tj 50.4 0 TD (n from the fifth grade were involved. There were 29 ) Tj ET endstream endobj 62 0 obj 2063 endobj 63 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 64 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (17) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (females and 19 males. Four of the children were left) Tj 374.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (handed. ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (Table 2 shows a summary of participants in the study by ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (school and grade.) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -122.4 -27.84 TD (Table 2. Summary of participants) Tj 230.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -224.16 -23.52 TD ( ) Tj 65.76 -11.52 TD ( ) Tj 78.24 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 16.32 -11.52 TD (3) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (rd) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( grade) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 20.64 -11.52 TD (5) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (th) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( grade) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (Total) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 581.28 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 581.76 0.48 0.48 re f 108 581.76 143.52 0.48 re f 251.52 581.28 0.48 0.48 re f 251.52 581.76 0.48 0.48 re f 252 581.76 103.2 0.48 re f 355.2 581.28 0.48 0.48 re f 355.2 581.76 0.48 0.48 re f 355.68 581.76 111.84 0.48 re f 467.52 581.28 0.48 0.48 re f 467.52 581.76 0.48 0.48 re f 468 581.76 71.52 0.48 re f 539.52 581.28 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 581.76 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 543.84 0.48 37.44 re f 251.52 543.84 0.48 37.44 re f 355.2 543.84 0.48 37.44 re f 467.52 543.84 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 543.84 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 537.6 TD ( ) Tj 36.96 -11.52 TD (Sch) Tj 21.6 0 TD (ool 1) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 49.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 38.4 -11.52 TD (23) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 50.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 -11.52 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (23) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 542.88 0.48 0.96 re f 108 543.36 143.52 0.48 re f 251.52 542.88 0.48 0.96 re f 252 543.36 103.2 0.48 re f 355.2 542.88 0.48 0.96 re f 355.68 543.36 111.84 0.48 re f 467.52 542.88 0.48 0.96 re f 468 543.36 71.52 0.48 re f 539.52 542.88 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 505.44 0.48 37.44 re f 251.52 505.44 0.48 37.44 re f 355.2 505.44 0.48 37.44 re f 467.52 505.44 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 505.44 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 499.2 TD ( ) Tj 36.96 -11.52 TD (School 2) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 49.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 -11.52 TD (2) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 53.76 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 42.72 -11.52 TD (23) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 55.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (25) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 504.48 0.48 0.96 re f 108 504.96 143.52 0.48 re f 251.52 504.48 0.48 0.96 re f 252 504.96 103.2 0.48 re f 355.2 504.48 0.48 0.96 re f 355.68 504.96 111.84 0.48 re f 467.52 504.48 0.48 0.96 re f 468 504.96 71.52 0.48 re f 539.52 504.48 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 467.04 0.48 37.44 re f 251.52 467.04 0.48 37.44 re f 355.2 467.04 0.48 37.44 re f 467.52 467.04 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 467.04 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 460.8 TD ( ) Tj 48 -11.52 TD (Total) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 60 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 38.4 -11.52 TD (25) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 50.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 42.72 -11.52 TD (23) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 55.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (48) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 466.08 0.48 0.96 re f 108 466.56 143.52 0.48 re f 251.52 466.08 0.48 0.96 re f 252 466.56 103.2 0.48 re f 355.2 466.08 0.48 0.96 re f 355.68 466.56 111.84 0.48 re f 467.52 466.08 0.48 0.96 re f 468 466.56 71.52 0.48 re f 539.52 466.08 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 428.64 0.48 37.44 re f 107.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 108 428.16 143.52 0.48 re f 251.52 428.64 0.48 37.44 re f 251.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 252 428.16 103.2 0.48 re f 355.2 428.64 0.48 37.44 re f 355.2 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 355.68 428.16 111.84 0.48 re f 467.52 428.64 0.48 37.44 re f 467.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 468 428.16 71.52 0.48 re f 539.52 428.64 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 428.16 0.48 0.48 re f BT 144 417.6 TD (The subjects came from five third grade classrooms and ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (three fifth grade classrooms and represented a diverse ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (socioeconomic status. The majority were Caucasian; however, ) Tj T* (several children, not) Tj 151.2 0 TD ( Caucasian, judged by their teachers to ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (speak English with proficiency \(native or near) Tj 331.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (native ) Tj -338.4 -27.84 TD (ability\), were also included in the study. A division by age ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (showed nine eight) Tj 122.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (olds, 16 nine) Tj 93.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (olds, 13 ten) Tj 86.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj -424.8 -27.84 TD (olds, and ten eleven) Tj 144 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year olds. All of th) Tj 144 0 TD (e third graders ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (were eight to nine years of age. The fifth graders included ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (in the study were 10) Tj 144 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 years of age. All of the results are ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (examined and shown by grade level and thus grouped in two ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (age groups \(8) Tj 93.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9, 10) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11\).) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (Participation was dependent on the r) Tj 259.2 0 TD (eturn of the ) Tj ET endstream endobj 65 0 obj 5298 endobj 66 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 67 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (18) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (parental consent form and the passing of a pure) Tj 338.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tone hearing ) Tj -345.6 -27.84 TD (screening for both ears. An immittance and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (electrophysiological screening \(Otoacoustic emissions or ) Tj T* (OAE\) was performed on each child to gather information that ) Tj T* (might clarify electroa) Tj 158.4 0 TD (coustic and APD relationships. The ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (absence of emissions alone did not eliminate subjects. Two ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (of the children were found to have \223refers\224 in the left ear ) Tj T* (on OAE. Both also showed type B tympanograms. However, both ) Tj T* (passed the hearing screening in the left ) Tj 295.2 0 TD (ear which included ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (250 and 500 Hz. Therefore, no children were eliminated from ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the test due to the hearing screening.) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (All children in all classrooms where the principals and ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (teachers agreed to participate were given the parental ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (consent form to have compl) Tj 187.2 0 TD (eted and return. Children were ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (included in this phase of the study randomly and as part of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (a larger data gathering on the MAPA. All children in each of ) Tj T* (the classrooms who qualified were tested. No special ) Tj T* (consideration in choosing participants was given to) Tj 367.2 0 TD ( factors ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (such as academic performance or teacher recommendation; ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (however, children were excluded due to a known diagnosis of ) Tj T* (mental retardation or limited English proficiency. These ) Tj T* (data were gathered after testing was completed. One child ) Tj ET endstream endobj 68 0 obj 1951 endobj 69 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 70 0 obj<> endobj 71 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (19) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (was found to hav) Tj 115.2 0 TD (e a cognitive impairment \(IQ < 70\). In ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (addition, there were two children who fell outside the 8) Tj 403.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 ) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (age range selected for this study. One of these children was ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the child with the cognitive impairment. Thus, these two ) Tj T* (test results were not included in the s) Tj 280.8 0 TD (tudy and the sample ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (size was dropped to n=48.) Tj 180 0 TD ( ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (Children with a diagnosis of ADHD would not have been ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (excluded from this study since they are part of the general ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (population for which the MAPA may be used to screen for APD. ) Tj T* (None of the children in this sample) Tj 252 0 TD ( had this diagnosis. ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (Three children had a diagnosis of learning disorders. Of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (these three, one child received speech and language ) Tj T* (services. The other two children both received additional ) Tj T* (services as part of their Individual Education Plan \(IEP\). ) Tj T* (Both rece) Tj 64.8 0 TD (ived services for reading and writing, and one ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (student for math.) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -122.4 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 180 0 TD (Question 1) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Statistical analysis of means and standard deviations) Tj 381.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -345.6 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (Means and standard deviations for forms A and B of the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (monaural tasks mSAAT and SINCA are shown in Table 3. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (results are) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( shown by ear and by age group. Mean monaural ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD (mSAAT scores were generally in the range of 10) Tj 331.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (12 out of 25 ) Tj ET endstream endobj 72 0 obj 2041 endobj 73 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 74 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (20) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (items, or about 40) Tj 129.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (50%. The mean scores for the fifth ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (graders were slightly higher \(1 or 2 items\) than for the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (third graders on both forms as expected) Tj 280.8 0 TD (. A t) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test showed a ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (mean difference of .4 between the left and right ear mean ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (scores \(p=0.381\) for form A. Form B showed a mean difference ) Tj T* (of .5 between ears \(p=0.313\). Since there was little ) Tj T* (difference between ears, it seemed reasonable to combine ) Tj T* (both sc) Tj 50.4 0 TD (ores for the left and right ears for one overall ) Tj -50.4 -27.84 TD (monaural score for each grade. On the mSAAT, the overall ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (mean score out of 50 items for third graders was 23.5 for ) Tj T* (form A and 21.3 for form B. For the fifth graders, the ) Tj T* (overall score was 24.2 for form A and) Tj 266.4 0 TD ( 23.6 for form B. The ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (fmax test was used to determine if any differences in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (standard deviations were significant. There were not any ) Tj T* (significant differences in standard deviations for any mSAAT ) Tj T* (task \(p>0.05\). ) Tj 108 0 TD ( ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (The SINCA shows scores as Signal to Noise Rat) Tj 324 0 TD (ios \(SNR\) ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (with lower scores indicating better performance on the test. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (There are 24 test items for each ear. A more complete ) Tj T* (description of the test and the scoring procedure is given ) Tj T* (in the literature review. In general, the lowest score would ) Tj T* (be a SNR of) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( 0. Originally, scores were tallied without ) Tj ET endstream endobj 75 0 obj 1933 endobj 76 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 77 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (21) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (giving the children any practice items, thus including all ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (24 items. Initial results showed poorer mean scores on the ) Tj T* (first test that were not shown on the other tests, ) Tj T* (suggesting a need for practice items to ens) Tj 309.6 0 TD (ure that the ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (children understood the task. Thus, the first four items on ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (each ear were used as practice items and the scoring was ) Tj T* (completed on the final 20 items. ) Tj 237.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (The mean scores using the 20 items were between 5) Tj 352.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (7 for ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (third graders and between 3) Tj 194.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (6 for f) Tj 50.4 0 TD (ifth graders, which was ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (consistent with the expectation that SNRs would get better ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(lower\) as children get older. A t) Tj 244.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test showed a mean ear ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (difference of .1 for form A \(p=0.794\). Since little ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difference was found between ears, scores were summed for a ) Tj T* (com) Tj 21.6 0 TD (bined monaural SINCA form A score. For form B, there was ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (a mean ear difference of 1.8, with the left ear being the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (poorer ear \(p=0.000\). While this mean difference is ) Tj T* (statistically significant, the scores for form B were also ) Tj T* (combined in order to be used a) Tj 216 0 TD (s a comparison. The third ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (graders showed 5.6 SNR for form A and 5.8 for form B when ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (combined. The fifth graders showed a combined mean score of ) Tj T* (3.8 SNR for form A and 4.2 SNR for form B. These findings ) Tj T* (indicate an improvement of 1) Tj 201.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (2 dB between the two grad) Tj 180 0 TD (es. ) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 78 0 obj 2065 endobj 79 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 80 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (22) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (For the standard deviations, the fmax ratio results ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (showed significant differences at the .05 level for the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (combined SINCA score for third graders as well as the right ) Tj T* (SINCA and combined SINCA for fifth graders. However, these ) Tj T* (findings were not signif) Tj 172.8 0 TD (icant at the .01 level.) Tj 165.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 81 0 obj 588 endobj 82 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 83 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (23) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Table 3. Means, standard deviations, and fmax ratio for ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (monaural tasks for right, left, and both ears combined ) Tj T* (**indicates significance at p<0.05) Tj 244.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -244.8 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 6.24 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 5.28 -11.52 TD (Grade) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD (Test) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 5.76 -11.52 TD (Ear) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 24 -11.52 TD (Form A) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 14.88 -11.52 TD (Form B) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0.48 -11.52 TD (fmax ratio) Tj ET q 532.8 616.8 6.72 13.92 re h W n BT 532.8 620.16 TD ( ) Tj ET Q 107.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 108 637.44 58.08 0.48 re f 166.08 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 166.08 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 166.56 637.44 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 219.84 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 220.32 637.44 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 264.96 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 265.44 637.44 103.2 0.48 re f 368.64 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 368.64 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 369.12 637.44 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 454.08 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 454.56 637.44 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 166.08 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 219.84 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 264.96 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 368.64 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 454.08 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f 539.52 613.44 0.48 23.52 re f BT 172.32 607.2 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (11.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (11.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.6) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.17) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 108 612.96 58.08 0.48 re f 166.08 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 612.96 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 612.96 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 612.96 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 612.48 0.48 0.48 re f 296.64 612.96 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 612.96 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 612.96 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 612.96 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 612.48 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 574.08 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 567.84 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (11.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (10.0) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.46) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 573.6 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 573.6 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 573.6 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 573.6 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 573.6 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 573.6 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 573.12 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 534.72 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 528.48 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (5.6) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (5.1) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (1.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (2.17) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 534.24 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 534.24 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 534.24 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 534.24 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 534.24 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 534.24 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 533.76 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 495.36 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 489.12 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (5.7) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (6.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.09) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 494.88 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 494.88 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 494.88 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 494.88 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 494.88 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 494.88 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 494.4 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 456 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 456 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 456 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 456 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 456 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 456 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 456 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 456 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 449.76 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (23.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.0) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (21.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.5) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (.79) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 455.52 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 455.52 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 455.52 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 455.52 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 455.52 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 455.52 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 455.04 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 416.64 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 607.2 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (3) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (rd) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -29.76 -13.92 TD (\(8) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj -14.4 -13.92 TD (n=25) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 20.64 -101.76 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (5.6) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.2) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (5.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (1.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 14.88 -11.52 TD (2.86**) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 416.16 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 416.16 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 416.16 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 416.16 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 416.16 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 416.16 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 415.68 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 377.28 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 371.04 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (12.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (3.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (11.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.5) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.74) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 108 376.8 58.08 0.48 re f 166.08 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 376.8 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 376.8 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 376.8 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 376.8 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 376.8 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 376.8 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 376.32 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 337.92 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 331.68 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAt) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (11.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.5) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (12.0) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.35) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 337.44 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 337.44 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 337.44 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 337.44 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 337.44 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 337.44 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 336.96 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 298.56 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 292.32 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (3.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (3.1) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (3.0) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (1.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 14.88 -11.52 TD (2.66**) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 298.08 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 298.08 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 298.08 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 298.08 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 298.08 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 298.08 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 297.6 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 259.2 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 252.96 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (3.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.1) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (5.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (1.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.22) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 258.72 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 258.72 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 258.72 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 258.72 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 258.72 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 258.72 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 258.24 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 219.84 0.48 38.4 re f BT 172.32 213.6 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (24.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.6) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (23.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.2) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.20) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 219.36 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 219.36 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 219.36 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 219.36 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 219.36 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 219.36 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 218.88 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 180.48 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 371.04 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (5) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (t) Tj 4.32 0 TD (h) Tj 4.32 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -36.96 -13.92 TD (\(10) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj -14.4 -13.92 TD (n=23) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 20.64 -101.76 TD ( ) Tj 2.88 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Bo) Tj 14.4 0 TD (th) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (3.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (2.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 -11.52 TD (4.2) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (1.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 14.88 -11.52 TD (2.65**) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 166.08 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 166.56 180 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 180 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 180 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 180 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 369.12 180 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 180 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 179.52 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 107.52 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 108 140.64 58.08 0.48 re f 166.08 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 166.08 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 166.56 140.64 53.28 0.48 re f 219.84 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 220.32 140.64 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 265.44 140.64 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 140.64 71.52 0.48 re f 368.64 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 368.64 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 369.12 140.64 84.96 0.48 re f 454.08 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 454.56 140.64 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 141.12 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 140.64 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 130.08 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD (The binaural tasks \(CS and DD\) are shown in Table 4. ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (The highest possible score for the CS task was 30 items ) Tj ET endstream endobj 84 0 obj 17619 endobj 85 0 obj<> endobj 86 0 obj<> endobj 87 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 88 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (24) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (correct in each ear for a total score of 60. The CS scores ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (are shown for the individual ears and as a total s) Tj 360 0 TD (core for ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (both ears. The third graders demonstrated a mean score in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (each ear between 11) Tj 136.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (13 with no apparent systematic ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (differences based on form or ear. A t) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test showed that mean ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (differences between ears was not significant for either form ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (A or form B \(p=0.) Tj 122.4 0 TD (819 and p=0.644 respectively\). Again, a ) Tj -122.4 -27.84 TD (monaural combined score was devised which showed a mean ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (score of 23.9 for form A and 22.3 for form B. The fifth ) Tj T* (graders showed a total mean score of 28.3 for form A and ) Tj T* (27.1 for form B. As before, a slight improvemen) Tj 338.4 0 TD (t was seen in ) Tj -338.4 -27.84 TD (the mean score for older subjects. The fmax ratios for ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (standard deviations do not show any significant differences ) Tj T* (on the binaural tasks of CS or DD \(p>0.05\).) Tj 309.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (For the DD task, two different scoring methods were ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (used. One procedure calculated) Tj 216 0 TD ( the total score out of 120 ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (possible items correct, repeated in a free recall condition. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (The other method looked at scores for the items in the right ) Tj T* (and left ears correctly repeated by ear as directed. For ) Tj T* (form A, the third graders scored between 24) Tj 309.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (26 it) Tj 36 0 TD (ems correct ) Tj -352.8 -27.84 TD (out of 60 total items for the left and right ears. The fifth ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (graders scored between 27) Tj 180 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (31 items correct for the left and ) Tj ET endstream endobj 89 0 obj 2107 endobj 90 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 91 0 obj<> endobj 92 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (25) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (right ears. A t) Tj 108 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test showed the mean difference between ears ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (to be 2.25, which was not statistically significant ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(p=0.13\). ) Tj 72 0 TD (For form B, the scores ranged between 27) Tj 288 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (30 for ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (the third graders and 34) Tj 172.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (38 for the fifth graders. The t) Tj 223.2 0 TD (-) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (test showed a mean difference of 2.42, or 4%, which was not ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (significant at the .01 level \(p=.041\). Using this scoring ) Tj T* (procedure, an ear difference is n) Tj 237.6 0 TD (ot judged to be clinically ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (relevant.) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (Neijenjuis, Snik, Priester, van Kordenoordt, and van ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (den Broek \(2002\) tested children ages 9) Tj 280.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (12 on a similar ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (dichotics digit task. Their procedure allowed for a free ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (recall condition with scores reported for only the ri) Tj 381.6 0 TD (ght and ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (only the left ear as well as a total score, regardless of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the order the numbers were repeated in. In this condition, ) Tj T* (Neijenjuis et al. showed a right ear advantage in scores ) Tj T* (with the mean difference in scores at 10% \(p<0.001\). This ) Tj T* (ear difference w) Tj 115.2 0 TD (as not shown with the scoring procedure used ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (in this study, likely because ears were not scored ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (separately in the same manner.) Tj 216 0 TD ( ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (Results are shown in Table 4 for the total scores ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (calculated in the free recall condition. The younger ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (subjects had mean scores ) Tj 180 0 TD (of 70.2 for form A and 78.5 for ) Tj ET endstream endobj 93 0 obj 2076 endobj 94 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 95 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (26) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (form B. As expected, the fifth graders again showed higher ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (mean scores at 79.2 for form A and 89.8 for form B in the DD ) Tj T* (task as compared to the third graders. There is an ) Tj T* (improvement of means scores in both groups from form ) Tj 381.6 0 TD (A to ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (form B ranging from about 9) Tj 194.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 items. As a group, the third ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (and fifth grader mean scores are between 58) Tj 309.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (75% for DD. This ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (percent score is very similar to the 60) Tj 280.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (72% range of total ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (mean scores found by Neijenhuis et al. \(2002\) for the group ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (of children) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( from 9) Tj 50.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (12 years. They found the mean score to be ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (about 65% for this age group, which would be similar to the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (9) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 year) Tj 50.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (olds in this study.) Tj 136.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (Table 4. Means, standard deviations, and fmax ratio for ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (binaural tasks **indicates significance at p<0.05) Tj 352.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -346.56 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD (Grade) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 18.24 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 4.8 -11.52 TD (Te) Tj 14.4 0 TD (st) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 5.76 -11.52 TD (Ear) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (Form A) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 17.28 -11.52 TD (Form B) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0.48 -11.52 TD (fmax ratio) Tj ET q 496.8 338.4 6.72 13.92 re h W n BT 496.8 341.76 TD ( ) Tj ET Q 71.52 358.56 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 72 359.04 60.96 0.48 re f 132.96 358.56 0.48 0.48 re f 132.96 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 133.44 359.04 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 358.56 0.48 0.48 re f 183.84 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 184.32 359.04 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 358.56 0.48 0.48 re f 228.96 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 229.44 359.04 98.4 0.48 re f 327.84 358.56 0.48 0.48 re f 327.84 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 328.32 359.04 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 358.56 0.48 0.48 re f 418.08 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 418.56 359.04 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 358.56 0.48 0.96 re f 503.52 359.04 0.48 0.48 re f 71.52 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 132.96 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 183.84 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 228.96 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 327.84 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 418.08 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f 503.52 335.04 0.48 23.52 re f BT 139.2 328.8 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (12.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (4.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (11.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (3.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 39.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.60) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 72 334.56 60.96 0.48 re f 132.96 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 334.56 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 334.56 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 334.56 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 334.08 0.48 0.48 re f 260.64 334.56 0.48 0.48 re f 261.12 334.56 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 334.56 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 334.56 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 334.08 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 295.68 0.48 38.4 re f BT 139.2 289.44 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (11.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (4.7) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (11.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (5.0) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 39.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.13) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 132.96 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 295.2 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 295.2 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 295.2 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 295.2 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 295.2 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 295.2 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 294.72 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 256.32 0.48 38.4 re f BT 139.2 250.08 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (23.9) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (8.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (22.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (7.7) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 39.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.34) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 132.96 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 255.84 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 255.84 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 255.84 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 255.84 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 255.84 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 255.84 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 255.36 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 216.96 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 328.8 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 -11.52 TD (3) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (rd) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -29.76 -13.92 TD (\(8) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj -14.4 -13.92 TD (n=25) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -23.04 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (70.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (13.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 25.44 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (78.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (16.7) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.46) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 216 0.48 0.96 re f 132.96 216 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 216.48 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 216 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 216.48 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 216 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 216.48 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 216 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 216.48 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 216 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 216.48 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 216 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 216.48 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 216 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 177.6 0.48 38.4 re f BT 139.2 171.36 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (13.7) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (3.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (13.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (2.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 39.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.72) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 72 177.12 60.96 0.48 re f 132.96 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 177.12 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 177.12 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 177.12 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 177.12 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 177.12 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 177.12 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 176.64 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 138.24 0.48 38.4 re f BT 139.2 132 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (14.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (4.0) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.28 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 -11.52 TD (13.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.2) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 39.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.10) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 132.96 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 137.76 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 137.76 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 137.76 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 137.76 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 137.76 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 137.76 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 137.28 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 132.96 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 183.84 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 228.96 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 327.84 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 418.08 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 98.88 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 171.36 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 -11.52 TD (5) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (th) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -36.96 -13.92 TD (\(10) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 36.48 2.4 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj 24.96 12.96 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (28.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 25.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (27.09) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.19) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 132.96 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 133.44 98.4 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 184.32 98.4 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 229.44 98.4 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 98.4 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 328.32 98.4 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 418.56 98.4 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 97.92 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 132.96 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 132.96 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 132.96 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 133.44 73.92 50.4 0.48 re f 183.84 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 183.84 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 184.32 73.92 44.64 0.48 re f 228.96 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 228.96 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 229.44 73.92 31.2 0.48 re f 260.64 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 260.64 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 261.12 73.92 66.72 0.48 re f 327.84 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 327.84 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 328.32 73.92 89.76 0.48 re f 418.08 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 418.08 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 418.56 73.92 84.96 0.48 re f 503.52 74.4 0.48 23.52 re f 503.52 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f 503.52 73.92 0.48 0.48 re f endstream endobj 96 0 obj 12102 endobj 97 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 98 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (27) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 271.68 682.08 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 0 TD (7.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 57.6 0 TD (6.7) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 692.64 0.48 0.96 re f 168.96 692.64 0.48 0.96 re f 168.96 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 169.44 693.12 50.4 0.48 re f 219.84 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 219.84 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 220.32 693.12 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 264.96 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 265.44 693.12 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 296.64 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 693.12 66.72 0.48 re f 363.84 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 363.84 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 364.32 693.12 89.76 0.48 re f 454.08 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 454.08 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 454.56 693.12 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 692.64 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 168.96 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 219.84 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 264.96 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 296.64 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 363.84 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 454.08 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f 539.52 675.36 0.48 17.28 re f BT 124.32 682.08 TD (n=23) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -12.96 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 1.92 -11.52 TD (Both) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 13.44 -11.52 TD (79.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (16.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 25.44 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (89.83) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (13.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.08 -11.52 TD (1.45) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 168.96 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 169.44 674.88 50.4 0.48 re f 219.84 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 220.32 674.88 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 265.44 674.88 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 674.88 66.72 0.48 re f 363.84 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 364.32 674.88 89.76 0.48 re f 454.08 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 454.56 674.88 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 674.4 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 636 0.48 38.4 re f 107.52 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 108 635.52 60.96 0.48 re f 168.96 636 0.48 38.4 re f 168.96 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 169.44 635.52 50.4 0.48 re f 219.84 636 0.48 38.4 re f 219.84 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 220.32 635.52 44.64 0.48 re f 264.96 636 0.48 38.4 re f 264.96 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 265.44 635.52 31.2 0.48 re f 296.64 636 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 635.52 66.72 0.48 re f 363.84 636 0.48 38.4 re f 363.84 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 364.32 635.52 89.76 0.48 re f 454.08 636 0.48 38.4 re f 454.08 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 454.56 635.52 84.96 0.48 re f 539.52 636 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 635.52 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 624.96 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD (The temporal tasks included PP and DP. The total score ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (possible for each t) Tj 136.8 0 TD (ask was 20 items correct. Table 5 shows ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (that the mean scores for the third graders were lower than ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (for the fifth graders. This again shows the improvement by ) Tj T* (age that would be expected. The scores for third and fifth ) Tj T* (graders range from 35) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (66%, so the ceili) Tj 122.4 0 TD (ng effect is clearly ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (not occurring in this sample. This was a concern for PP on ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the previous MAPA, especially with the fifth graders. ) Tj 388.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -352.8 -27.84 TD (The lowering of scores is consistent with the fact that ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (both the PP and DP tasks now involve a series of four tones ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (rathe) Tj 36 0 TD (r than three. In addition, reversals were not scored as ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (correct, as was the protocol for the previous MAPA. This was ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (also done in order to avoid a ceiling effect. However, when ) Tj T* (examining the full data set, including the data in a ) Tj T* (companion study to establi) Tj 187.2 0 TD (sh tentative norms, a score of 2 ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (SD below the mean was not possible in PP since this was a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (negative number. Thus it appears that not scoring reversals ) Tj T* (as correct might be too stringent for this young age group ) Tj T* (\(8) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 years\). On the scoring protocol, many of) Tj 309.6 0 TD ( the reversals ) Tj ET endstream endobj 99 0 obj 4554 endobj 100 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 101 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (28) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (were marked on the forms but not originally scored as ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (correct. The PP portion was re) Tj 216 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (scored with reversals as ) Tj -223.2 -27.84 TD (correct. The outcome of this change in scoring and the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tentative norms for the PP task are discussed in a companion ) Tj T* (study. For now ) Tj 108 0 TD (it appears that reversals will be scored as ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (correct, at least for the younger subjects, although this ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (change is not reflected in the numbers reported here. ) Tj 388.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 102 0 obj 794 endobj 103 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 104 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (29) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Table 5. Means, standard deviations, and fmax ratio for ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (temporal tasks **indicates significance at) Tj 302.4 0 TD ( p<0.05) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -346.56 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 9.6 -11.52 TD (Grade) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 11.52 -11.52 TD (Test) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 -11.52 TD (Form A) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 -11.52 TD (Form B) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 5.28 -11.52 TD (fmax ratio) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 664.8 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 108 665.28 66.72 0.48 re f 174.72 664.8 0.48 0.48 re f 174.72 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 175.2 665.28 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 664.8 0.48 0.48 re f 239.04 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 239.52 665.28 110.88 0.48 re f 350.4 664.8 0.48 0.48 re f 350.4 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 350.88 665.28 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 664.8 0.48 0.48 re f 444.96 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 445.44 665.28 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 664.8 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 665.28 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f 174.72 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f 239.04 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f 350.4 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f 444.96 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f 539.52 641.28 0.48 23.52 re f BT 180.96 635.04 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 -11.52 TD (11.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (6.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (11.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (6.2) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (1.03) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 108 640.8 66.72 0.48 re f 174.72 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 175.2 640.8 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 239.52 640.8 34.08 0.48 re f 273.6 640.32 0.48 0.48 re f 273.6 640.8 0.48 0.48 re f 274.08 640.8 76.32 0.48 re f 350.4 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 350.88 640.8 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 445.44 640.8 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 640.32 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 174.72 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 239.04 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 273.6 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 350.4 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 444.96 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 601.92 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 635.04 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 -11.52 TD (3) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (rd) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -29.76 -13.92 TD (\(8) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (n=25) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 13.92 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 -11.52 TD (DP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (7.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (4.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 30.24 -11.52 TD (9.0) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -21.6 -13.92 TD (5.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (1.22) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 174.72 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 175.2 601.44 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 239.52 601.44 34.08 0.48 re f 273.6 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 274.08 601.44 76.32 0.48 re f 350.4 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 350.88 601.44 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 445.44 601.44 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 600.96 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 174.72 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 239.04 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 273.6 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 350.4 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 444.96 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 562.56 0.48 38.4 re f BT 180.96 556.32 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 -11.52 TD (12.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (5.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (13.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (5.5) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (1.04) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 108 562.08 66.72 0.48 re f 174.72 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 175.2 562.08 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 239.52 562.08 34.08 0.48 re f 273.6 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 274.08 562.08 76.32 0.48 re f 350.4 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 350.88 562.08 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 445.44 562.08 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 561.6 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 174.72 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 239.04 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 273.6 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 350.4 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 444.96 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 523.2 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 556.32 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 -11.52 TD (5) Tj 7.2 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (th) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -36.96 -13.92 TD (\(10) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (years\)) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (n=23) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.96 13.92 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 -11.52 TD (DP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 19.68 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 -11.52 TD (11.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (4.7) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (12.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (4.5) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 42.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 26.88 -11.52 TD (1.09) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 174.72 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 175.2 522.72 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 239.52 522.72 34.08 0.48 re f 273.6 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 274.08 522.72 76.32 0.48 re f 350.4 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 350.88 522.72 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 445.44 522.72 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 522.24 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 107.52 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 108 483.36 66.72 0.48 re f 174.72 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 174.72 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 175.2 483.36 63.84 0.48 re f 239.04 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 239.04 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 239.52 483.36 34.08 0.48 re f 273.6 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 273.6 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 274.08 483.36 76.32 0.48 re f 350.4 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 350.4 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 350.88 483.36 94.08 0.48 re f 444.96 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 444.96 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 445.44 483.36 94.08 0.48 re f 539.52 483.84 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 483.36 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 472.8 TD ( ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (T) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test ex) Tj 50.4 0 TD (amination of means) Tj 129.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (The paired t) Tj 86.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test is used to compare the means of ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (scores for related samples such as the tests on form A and B ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (when given to the same individuals. It is used to determine ) Tj T* (if the differences in means between forms are significant. ) Tj T* (The use) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( of a t) Tj 50.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test indicated that there was not a ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (significant difference on eight of the tests. However, the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (mSAAT combined test showed a significant difference at the ) Tj T* (.05 level \(p=.043\) and three tests, including the SINCA left ) Tj T* (ear \(p=.008\), DD \(p=.000\), DP \(p=) Tj 237.6 0 TD (.002\), were found to be ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (significantly different at the .01 level. The results of the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (paired t) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test are shown in Table 6.) Tj 187.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 105 0 obj 7810 endobj 106 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 107 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (30) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (Table 6. T) Tj 72 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test results for tests on form A and B. ) Tj -79.2 -13.92 TD (**indicates significance at .05 level *indicates ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (significance at .01 level N=48; df) Tj 244.8 0 TD (=47) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -266.4 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 6.24 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 102.24 -11.52 TD (A/B form test) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 114.24 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 11.52 -11.52 TD (Significance) Tj 86.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 72 637.44 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 382.08 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 382.56 637.44 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 503.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 71.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 593.28 TD ( ) Tj 109.44 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 121.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.190) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 72 599.04 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 599.04 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 554.88 TD ( ) Tj 113.28 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 124.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.118) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 72 560.64 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 560.64 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 516.48 TD ( ) Tj 80.64 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ears combined) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 92.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 -11.52 TD (.043**) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 72 522.24 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 522.24 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 478.08 TD ( ) Tj 109.44 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 121.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.197) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 72 483.84 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 483.84 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 439.68 TD ( ) Tj 113.28 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 124.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 -11.52 TD (.008*) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 72 445.44 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 445.44 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 401.28 TD ( ) Tj 80.64 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ears combined) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 92.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.439) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 72 407.04 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 407.04 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 362.88 TD ( ) Tj 120.48 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 132 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.051) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 72 368.64 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 368.64 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 324.48 TD ( ) Tj 123.84 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 135.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.279) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 72 330.24 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 330.24 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 286.08 TD ( ) Tj 91.68 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ears combined) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 103.2 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.071) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 72 291.84 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 291.84 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 247.68 TD ( ) Tj 142.08 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 153.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 -11.52 TD (.000*) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 72 253.44 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 253.44 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 209.28 TD ( ) Tj 142.08 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 153.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 40.32 -11.52 TD (.217) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 72 215.04 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 215.04 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 78.24 170.88 TD ( ) Tj 142.08 -11.52 TD (DP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 153.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 -11.52 TD (.002*) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 72 176.64 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 382.56 176.64 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 71.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 71.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 72 138.24 310.08 0.48 re f 382.08 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 382.08 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 382.56 138.24 120.96 0.48 re f 503.52 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 503.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 503.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 127.68 TD (For the combined mSAAT score, a .05 level of ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (significance in the means for forms A and B is shown by a ) Tj ET endstream endobj 108 0 obj 6182 endobj 109 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 110 0 obj<> endobj 111 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (31) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (difference of about two words on a 50) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (word task, not a large ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (practical difference. The .01 level of significance on three ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tests \(SINCA left, DD) Tj 151.2 0 TD (, DP\) might be taken to indicate a need ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (for greater equivalence on these tests. The differences, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (however, in terms of practical testing considerations do not ) Tj T* (represent very large actual score discrepancies. The left ) Tj T* (ear SINCA results between form A and B s) Tj 288 0 TD (how a mean ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (difference of less than one word out of 20 given. A practice ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (effect does not account for this because the form B results ) Tj T* (are poorer. So it would seem to be a matter of harder items. ) Tj T* (However, even though the practical difference is small, the ) Tj T* (ite) Tj 21.6 0 TD (ms on both forms of the SINCA will be under revision in ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (future research to find tests that show better correlations ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (and less mean differences as discussed in the correlation ) Tj T* (section. ) Tj 64.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (It appears in the other two cases \(DP and DD\) that a ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (learning effect cou) Tj 136.8 0 TD (ld explain the difference since the order ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (of A and B were not randomized and form A was always given ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (first. In these two tests, there are either limited or no ) Tj T* (practice items recorded on the CD for forms A and B. Thus, ) Tj T* (it seems likely that the differences i) Tj 273.6 0 TD (ndicate a learning ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (effect with better scores on the second test \(form B\).) Tj 388.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 112 0 obj 1974 endobj 113 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 114 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (32) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (The mean difference between A and B forms for DP ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (involves only about two items on a 20) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (item task. It is ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (almost impossible to explain this difference on the basis of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (items since 17 of) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( the 20 items on both tests are absolutely ) Tj -122.4 -27.84 TD (identical except for the randomized order. Among the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (remaining three different items of form B \(LSSS, LSSL, and ) Tj T* (LSLS\), one actually matches a similar pattern of form A ) Tj T* (\(LSSS on form B matches LLLS on form A\). Furt) Tj 324 0 TD (her, the ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (remaining items do not appear that different. More practice ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (prior to starting the DP task may be indicated since ) Tj T* (currently there is only one practice item.) Tj 302.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (The percent difference on DD is similar to DP in that ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (it involves a difference of 9) Tj 208.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 ite) Tj 43.2 0 TD (ms on a task of 120 ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (items. It seemed that the use of the first 12 items on both ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tests for practice items might have eliminated this score ) Tj T* (difference while only reducing the scored items to 96. ) Tj T* (However, when this was calculated, the correlation between ) Tj T* (test) Tj 28.8 0 TD (s remained the same as well as the t) Tj 259.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test significance ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (of p=0.000. When the difference between means was divided by ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the total number of items, the percent difference only ) Tj T* (changed from 7.5% to 7.3% with the recalculation. Thus, not ) Tj T* (counting the practice ite) Tj 180 0 TD (ms did not improve the mean ) Tj ET endstream endobj 115 0 obj 2011 endobj 116 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 117 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (33) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (difference between forms. Since both forms use the same ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (eight digits, it does not seem possible that form A could be ) Tj T* (harder than form B. It seems more likely that learning ) Tj T* (occurs and that most people will perform better in the ) Tj T* (s) Tj 7.2 0 TD (econd testing session. ) Tj 165.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (However, when considering both DD and DP, it is ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (noteworthy that even though there are mean differences, this ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (may not be a serious concern since the strong correlations ) Tj T* (between A and B forms for DD \(r=.69\) and especially DP ) Tj T* (\(r=.85\), ) Tj 64.8 0 TD (as shown in Table 7, nevertheless indicate that the ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (forms are highly related. Modest adjustments in practice ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (items for DP could be considered.) Tj 237.6 0 TD /F0 12 Tf ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 118 0 obj 1100 endobj 119 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 120 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (34) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD /F0 12 Tf ( ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Correlations between forms) Tj 187.2 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (Correlations between the A and B forms for the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (individual tests are shown in Table 7) Tj 266.4 0 TD (. When looking at mSAAT ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (and SINCA, the correlations ranged from .17 to .28 and are ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (disappointingly low as well as not statistically ) Tj T* (significant. However, the correlation for combined ear ) Tj T* (totals for each of the monaural tasks, mSAAT and SINCA, ) Tj T* (showed that t) Tj 93.6 0 TD (he two forms are related more strongly when ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (combined \(.37 to .40\). These correlations are statistically ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (significant, but still only moderate in magnitude. For DD, ) Tj T* (CS, DP and PP, the correlations ranged from .69 to .89 and ) Tj T* (are very acceptable as well as sta) Tj 244.8 0 TD (tistically significant. ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (The correlations show that forms A and B of all tests are ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (significantly related, either when looked at by ear or, for ) Tj T* (mSAAT and SINCA, when ears are combined.) Tj 288 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 121 0 obj 1382 endobj 122 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 123 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (35) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Table 7. Pearson correlation between test forms arranged by ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (strength of ) Tj 86.4 0 TD (correlation. N=48 **indicates significant ) Tj -86.4 -13.92 TD (correlation at .05 level) Tj 172.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -172.8 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 102.24 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (A/B form test) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -11.52 TD (Correlation) Tj ET q 438.24 616.8 5.28 13.92 re h W n BT 438.24 620.16 TD ( ) Tj ET Q 203.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 204 637.44 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 352.32 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 352.8 637.44 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 443.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 203.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 593.28 TD ( ) Tj 60.96 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 73.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.89**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 204 599.04 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 599.04 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 561.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 554.88 TD ( ) Tj 60.96 -11.52 TD (DP) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 73.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.85**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 204 560.64 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 560.64 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 522.72 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 516.48 TD ( ) Tj 10.56 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ears combined) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 23.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.78**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 204 522.24 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 522.24 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 521.76 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 484.32 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 478.08 TD ( ) Tj 43.2 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 55.2 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.74**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 204 483.84 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 483.84 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 483.36 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 445.92 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 439.68 TD ( ) Tj 39.36 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 51.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.71**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 204 445.44 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 445.44 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 444.96 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 407.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 401.28 TD ( ) Tj 60.96 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 73.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.69**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 204 407.04 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 407.04 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 406.56 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 369.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 362.88 TD ( ) Tj 0 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj ET q 253.44 348 98.88 13.92 re h W n BT 253.44 351.36 TD (ears combined ) Tj ET Q BT 359.04 362.88 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.40**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 204 368.64 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 368.64 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 368.16 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 330.72 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 324.48 TD ( ) Tj 0 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ears combined) Tj ET q 347.04 309.6 5.28 13.92 re h W n BT 347.04 312.96 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 359.04 324.48 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.37**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 204 330.24 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 330.24 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 329.76 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 292.32 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 286.08 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (SI) Tj 14.4 0 TD (NCA) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right ) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (.28) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 204 291.84 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 291.84 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 291.36 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 253.92 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 247.68 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left ) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 37.44 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (.26) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 204 253.44 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 253.44 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 252.96 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 215.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 209.28 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 -11.52 TD (SINCA) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (left) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 44.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (.26) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 204 215.04 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 215.04 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 214.56 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 177.12 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 170.88 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (right ) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -11.52 TD (.17) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 204 176.64 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 176.64 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 176.16 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 203.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 203.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 204 138.24 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 352.8 138.24 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 138.72 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f 443.52 138.24 0.48 0.48 re f BT 144 127.68 TD (The disappointing results on the SINCA led to item by ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (item analysis on the form A test/re) Tj 252 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test, which was examined ) Tj ET endstream endobj 124 0 obj 6352 endobj 125 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 126 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (36) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (in a companion study. The most reliable half of the SINCA ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (items fo) Tj 57.6 0 TD (r each ear was given a double weighting for scoring. ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD (These changes moved test) Tj 172.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (retest correlations from .2) Tj 194.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.3 to ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (.5) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.53. Thus, some improvement in this test may be possible, ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (which would alter the mean scores as well. Eventually, the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (two reliable halves of t) Tj 172.8 0 TD (he right and left ear SINCA items ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (will be combined into one task for one ear on form A. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Similar work will be done with the words on form B to ) Tj T* (provide a reliable task for the other ear on form A. When ) Tj T* (this is completed, more testing will be done to see if t) Tj 403.2 0 TD (he ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (changes improve the correlations. If it is successful, a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (similar procedure will take place to provide the SINCA items ) Tj T* (for form B.) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Monaural, binaural, and temporal tasks) Tj 273.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (As has been discussed, the final MAPA will contain ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (tasks in the monaural, binaural, ) Tj 237.6 0 TD (and temporal areas. It is ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (of interest to look at the means, standard deviations, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (correlations, and t) Tj 136.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test results when these tasks are ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (combined. The monaural tasks are the mSAAT and the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (experimental SINCA. The binaural tasks are CS and DD. The ) Tj T* (temporal tas) Tj 86.4 0 TD (ks that were combined here are PP and the ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (experimental Quick Tap test. The Quick Tap, an experimental ) Tj ET endstream endobj 127 0 obj 2095 endobj 128 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 129 0 obj<> endobj 130 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (37) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (task with only one version, is described and examined in a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (companion study. As mentioned previously, the Quick Tap, ) Tj T* (while given to all 48 subjects during ) Tj 273.6 0 TD (form A, was only given ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (to 25 subjects during form B. However, the results of the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (companion study suggest that the Quick Tap correlates well ) Tj T* (with the PP task so it is included in this portion of the ) Tj T* (study.) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (Table 8 shows the means, standard deviations, and ) Tj 360 0 TD (t) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (test significance for the combined monaural, binaural, and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (temporal task scores. It also shows a composite score of all ) Tj T* (the tasks. The monaural tasks show a mean difference of 1.7 ) Tj T* (between forms \(p=0.052\). The low significance is not ) Tj T* (surprising considerin) Tj 151.2 0 TD (g the issues that have already been ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (discussed concerning the SINCA. Again, when the practical ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difference is considered, nearly 2 items out of a combined ) Tj T* (total possible score involving 70 items does not seem to be ) Tj T* (a matter of large concern \(2% of total scor) Tj 309.6 0 TD (e\). The binaural ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (tasks present with a mean difference of 8 items between the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (two forms, which is significant at the .01 level \(p=0.000\). ) Tj T* (This is also not surprising considering the apparent ) Tj T* (learning that seems to occur when the DD task is taken a ) Tj T* (second ti) Tj 64.8 0 TD (me. This difference represents 5% of the total ) Tj ET endstream endobj 131 0 obj 1881 endobj 132 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 133 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (38) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (score possible. The temporal tasks only show a .4 mean ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difference between forms \(p=0.727\). This result using the ) Tj T* (Quick Tap combined with the PP is very encouraging. It is ) Tj T* (also encouraging to see a mean differe) Tj 273.6 0 TD (nce in the composite ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (score of only 3.7 \(p=0.340\). Thus, when the test is looked ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (at as a whole, there is not a significant difference in the ) Tj T* (scores between form A and form B. In addition, the fmax ) Tj T* (ratio shows that there is not a significant difference in ) Tj T* (th) Tj 14.4 0 TD (e standard deviations between forms.) Tj 259.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 134 0 obj 884 endobj 135 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 136 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (39) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Table 8. Means, standard deviations, t) Tj 273.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test significance, ) Tj -280.8 -13.92 TD (and fmax ratio for combined monaural, binaural, and temporal ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (tasks *indicates significance at .01 level) Tj 302.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -302.4 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 6.24 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (Tests) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.64 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (Form A) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 10.56 -11.52 TD (Form B) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 23.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (Sig.) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (fmax ) Tj -3.84 -13.92 TD (ratio) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 108 637.44 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 197.76 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 198.24 637.44 98.4 0.48 re f 296.64 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 296.64 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 637.44 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 372.96 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 373.44 637.44 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 636.96 0.48 0.48 re f 456.48 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 456.96 637.44 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 636.96 0.48 0.96 re f 539.52 637.44 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 197.76 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 296.64 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 372.96 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 456.48 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f 539.52 599.52 0.48 37.44 re f BT 114.24 593.28 TD ( ) Tj 10.08 -11.52 TD (monaural) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -13.92 TD (n=4) Tj 21.6 0 TD (8) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj ET q 218.4 563.52 6.24 13.92 re h W n BT 218.4 566.88 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 230.88 593.28 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (39.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -24.96 -13.92 TD (5.9) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.2 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 -11.52 TD (37.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (5.4) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 34.08 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (.052) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (1.19) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 108 599.04 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 198.24 599.04 26.4 0.48 re f 224.64 598.56 0.48 0.48 re f 224.64 599.04 0.48 0.48 re f 225.12 599.04 71.52 0.48 re f 296.64 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 599.04 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 373.44 599.04 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 456.96 599.04 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 598.56 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 197.76 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 224.64 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 372.96 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 456.48 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 560.16 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 553.92 TD ( ) Tj 10.08 -11.52 TD (binaural) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -13.92 TD (n=48) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj ET q 218.4 524.16 6.24 13.92 re h W n BT 218.4 527.52 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 230.88 553.92 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (100.5) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (19.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (108.5) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.16 -13.92 TD (21.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 30.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 17.28 -11.52 TD (.000*) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (1.18) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 108 559.68 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 198.24 559.68 26.4 0.48 re f 224.64 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 225.12 559.68 71.52 0.48 re f 296.64 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 559.68 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 373.44 559.68 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 456.96 559.68 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 559.2 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 197.76 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 224.64 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 372.96 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 456.48 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 520.8 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 514.56 TD ( ) Tj 10.08 -11.52 TD (temporal) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -13.92 TD (n=25) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj ET q 218.4 484.8 6.24 13.92 re h W n BT 218.4 488.16 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 230.88 514.56 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (34.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (11.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 17.76 -11.52 TD (34.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (11.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 30.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (.727) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (1.04) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 108 520.32 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 198.24 520.32 26.4 0.48 re f 224.64 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 225.12 520.32 71.52 0.48 re f 296.64 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 520.32 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 373.44 520.32 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 456.96 520.32 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 519.84 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 197.76 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 224.64 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 296.64 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 372.96 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 456.48 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f 539.52 481.44 0.48 38.4 re f BT 114.24 475.2 TD ( ) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD (Composite ) Tj 14.4 -13.92 TD (Total) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (n=25) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 36.48 39.36 TD ( ) Tj 0 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -6.24 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj ET q 218.4 445.44 6.24 13.92 re h W n BT 218.4 448.8 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 230.88 475.2 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (168.5) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (27.0) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (172.2) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.16 -13.92 TD (31.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 30.24 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (.340) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.12 -11.52 TD (1.33) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 107.52 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 108 480.96 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 198.24 480.96 26.4 0.48 re f 224.64 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 225.12 480.96 71.52 0.48 re f 296.64 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 297.12 480.96 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 373.44 480.96 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 456.96 480.96 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 480.48 0.48 0.96 re f 107.52 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 107.52 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 107.52 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 108 428.64 89.76 0.48 re f 197.76 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 197.76 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 198.24 428.64 26.4 0.48 re f 224.64 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 224.64 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 225.12 428.64 71.52 0.48 re f 296.64 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 296.64 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 297.12 428.64 75.84 0.48 re f 372.96 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 372.96 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 373.44 428.64 83.04 0.48 re f 456.48 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 456.48 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 456.96 428.64 82.56 0.48 re f 539.52 429.12 0.48 51.36 re f 539.52 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f 539.52 428.64 0.48 0.48 re f BT 108 418.08 TD ( ) Tj 36 -27.84 TD (The correlations for these tasks a) Tj 244.8 0 TD (re shown in Table 9. ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (All of the combined tests show correlations that are ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (statistically significant. The monaural correlation of .46 ) Tj T* (shows a moderate but acceptable level of correlation. The ) Tj T* (binaural and temporal tasks show very high correlations ) Tj T* (between .) Tj 64.8 0 TD (81) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (90. When the composite scores are examined, ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (there is a high and very acceptable correlation of .79.) Tj 396 0 TD ( ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (Table 9. Correlations for combined monaural, binaural, and ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (temporal tasks **indicates significance at .05 level) Tj 374.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -374.4 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 102.24 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (A/B form test) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 0 -11.52 TD (Correlation) Tj ET q 438.24 143.04 5.28 13.92 re h W n BT 438.24 146.4 TD ( ) Tj ET Q 203.52 163.2 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 163.68 0.48 0.48 re f 204 163.68 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 163.2 0.48 0.48 re f 352.32 163.68 0.48 0.48 re f 352.8 163.68 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 163.2 0.48 0.96 re f 443.52 163.68 0.48 0.48 re f 203.52 125.76 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 125.76 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 125.76 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 119.52 TD ( ) Tj 39.36 -11.52 TD (monaural) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 51.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.46**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 124.8 0.48 0.96 re f 204 125.28 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 124.8 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 125.28 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 124.8 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 87.36 0.48 37.44 re f 352.32 87.36 0.48 37.44 re f 443.52 87.36 0.48 37.44 re f BT 210.24 81.12 TD ( ) Tj 148.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 203.52 86.4 0.48 0.96 re f 204 86.88 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 86.4 0.48 0.96 re f 352.8 86.88 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 86.4 0.48 0.96 re f 203.52 79.68 0.48 6.72 re f 203.52 79.2 0.48 0.48 re f 203.52 79.2 0.48 0.48 re f 204 79.2 148.32 0.48 re f 352.32 79.68 0.48 6.72 re f 352.32 79.2 0.48 0.48 re f 352.8 79.2 90.72 0.48 re f 443.52 79.68 0.48 6.72 re f 443.52 79.2 0.48 0.48 re f 443.52 79.2 0.48 0.48 re f endstream endobj 137 0 obj 9274 endobj 138 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 139 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (40) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 213.6 682.08 TD (binaural) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 73.44 0 TD (.81**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 167.52 692.64 0.48 0.96 re f 167.52 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 168 693.12 148.32 0.48 re f 316.32 692.64 0.48 0.48 re f 316.32 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 316.8 693.12 90.72 0.48 re f 407.52 692.64 0.48 0.96 re f 407.52 693.12 0.48 0.48 re f 167.52 661.44 0.48 31.2 re f 316.32 661.44 0.48 31.2 re f 407.52 661.44 0.48 31.2 re f BT 174.24 655.2 TD ( ) Tj 39.36 -11.52 TD (temporal) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 51.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.90**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 167.52 660.48 0.48 0.96 re f 168 660.96 148.32 0.48 re f 316.32 660.48 0.48 0.96 re f 316.8 660.96 90.72 0.48 re f 407.52 660.48 0.48 0.96 re f 167.52 623.04 0.48 37.44 re f 316.32 623.04 0.48 37.44 re f 407.52 623.04 0.48 37.44 re f BT 174.24 616.8 TD ( ) Tj 14.4 -11.52 TD (Composite Total) Tj 108 0 TD ( ) Tj 26.4 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 -11.52 TD (.79**) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 167.52 622.08 0.48 0.96 re f 168 622.56 148.32 0.48 re f 316.32 622.08 0.48 0.96 re f 316.8 622.56 90.72 0.48 re f 407.52 622.08 0.48 0.96 re f 167.52 584.64 0.48 37.44 re f 167.52 584.16 0.48 0.48 re f 167.52 584.16 0.48 0.48 re f 168 584.16 148.32 0.48 re f 316.32 584.64 0.48 37.44 re f 316.32 584.16 0.48 0.48 re f 316.8 584.16 90.72 0.48 re f 407.52 584.64 0.48 37.44 re f 407.52 584.16 0.48 0.48 re f 407.52 584.16 0.48 0.48 re f endstream endobj 140 0 obj 1568 endobj 141 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 142 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (41) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD ( ) Tj 180 0 TD (Question 2) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (This section compares the means and standard deviations ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (of four tests, mSAAT, CS, DD, and PP on the current MAPA ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (compared to previous MAPA versions. This wad done to ) Tj T* (determin) Tj 57.6 0 TD (e if scores compare favorably to previous versions ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD (and to see if the ceiling effect was overcome, which was a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (concern in the previous MAPA. The tasks that were modified ) Tj T* (for the Beta III MAPA to make them more difficult include ) Tj T* (CS, DD, and PP. The mSAAT was) Tj 208.8 0 TD ( modified between the first two ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (Beta versions of the MAPA.) Tj 187.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (The scores are shown as percent means and standard ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (deviations in Table 10. The present third grader scores are ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (compared to the scores found by Domitz \(1997\) with the Beta ) Tj T* (I version of MAPA. The pre) Tj 187.2 0 TD (sent fifth grader scores are ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (compared to the scores of Shiffman \(1999\) with the Beta II ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (version of MAPA. Part of the modification for the Beta III ) Tj T* (MAPA included presenting PP binaurally. Thus there is only ) Tj T* (one score for each grade to compare to the two tas) Tj 360 0 TD (ks shown ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (by the previous MAPA. In addition, the current scoring ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (procedure used for DD did not show significant differences ) Tj T* (by ear, as discussed previously. Thus, the total percent ) Tj T* (score is compared to the previous right and left ear scores. ) Tj T* (The means and s) Tj 108 0 TD (tandard deviations for the present study, ) Tj ET endstream endobj 143 0 obj 1967 endobj 144 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 145 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (42) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (while not displayed in percent format, are also shown in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Tables 3, 4, and 5.) Tj 136.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (Table 10. Percent means and standard deviations compared for ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD (Beta I, II, and III version of the MAPA.) Tj 288 0 TD ( ) Tj -281.76 -9.6 TD ( ) Tj 33.6 -11.52 TD (Test) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 45.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 35.52 -11.52 TD (Third grade) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 47.04 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 35.52 -11.52 TD (Fifth grade) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 609.12 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 609.6 0.48 0.48 re f 72 609.6 107.52 0.48 re f 179.52 609.12 0.48 0.48 re f 179.52 609.6 0.48 0.48 re f 180 609.6 161.76 0.48 re f 341.76 609.12 0.48 0.48 re f 341.76 609.6 0.48 0.48 re f 342.24 609.6 161.28 0.48 re f 503.52 609.12 0.48 0.96 re f 503.52 609.6 0.48 0.48 re f 71.52 585.6 0.48 23.52 re f 179.52 585.6 0.48 23.52 re f 341.76 585.6 0.48 23.52 re f 503.52 585.6 0.48 23.52 re f BT 78.24 579.36 TD ( ) Tj 48 -11.52 TD ( ) Tj 60 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12.96 -11.52 TD (Beta I) Tj 43.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 24.48 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 9.12 -11.52 TD (present) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 21.6 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 6.72 -11.52 TD (Beta II) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 18.72 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 12 -11.52 TD (present) Tj 50.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 584.64 0.48 0.96 re f 72 585.12 107.52 0.48 re f 179.52 584.64 0.48 0.96 re f 180 585.12 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 584.64 0.48 0.48 re f 260.64 585.12 0.48 0.48 re f 261.12 585.12 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 584.64 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 585.12 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 584.64 0.48 0.48 re f 417.12 585.12 0.48 0.48 re f 417.6 585.12 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 584.64 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f 179.52 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f 260.64 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f 341.76 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f 417.12 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f 503.52 561.12 0.48 23.52 re f BT 78.24 554.88 TD ( ) Tj 4.8 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (65.9) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (10.26) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 28.32 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (47.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (9.64) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (78.33) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (10.98) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 25.92 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (49.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.16 -13.92 TD (13.25) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 72 560.64 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 560.16 0.48 0.48 re f 143.52 560.64 0.48 0.48 re f 144 560.64 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 180 560.64 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 560.64 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 560.64 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 560.64 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 560.16 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 521.76 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 515.52 TD ( ) Tj 4.8 -11.52 TD (mSAAT) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 16.32 -11.52 TD (61.09) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (11.53) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 28.32 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (47.6) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (9.44) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 17.28 -11.52 TD (77.0) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (7.65) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (47.13) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (10.02) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 72 521.28 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 144 521.28 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 180 521.28 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 521.28 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 521.28 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 521.28 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 520.8 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 482.4 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 476.16 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (78.0) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (21.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 112.8 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (97.98) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (3.44) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 72 481.92 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 144 481.92 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 180 481.92 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 481.92 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 481.92 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 481.92 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 481.44 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 443.04 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 436.8 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (PP) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (81.7) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (20.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 64.8 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (57.2) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (31.7) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (97.68) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (2.3) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 33.12 64.8 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (62.61) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (26.96) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 72 442.56 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 144 442.56 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 180 442.56 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 341.76 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 442.56 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 503.52 442.08 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 403.68 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 397.44 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (92.3) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -25.44 -13.92 TD (7.8) Tj 21.6 0 TD ( ) Tj 116.64 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (95.63) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (5.55) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 72 403.2 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 144 403.2 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 180 403.2 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 403.2 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 403.2 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 403.2 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 402.72 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 364.32 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 358.08 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (DD) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (78.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (15.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 64.8 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (58.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (11.49) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (90.63) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (8.80) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 64.8 TD ( ) Tj 19.2 -11.52 TD (65.98) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -36 -13.92 TD (13.57) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 72 363.84 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 144 363.84 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 180 363.84 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 341.76 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 363.84 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 503.52 363.36 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 324.96 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 318.72 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (R) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (89.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (13.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (41.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (15.93) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 28.8 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (98.33) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (5.77) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (45.8) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.16 -13.92 TD (12.68) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 324 0.48 0.96 re f 72 324.48 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 324 0.48 0.96 re f 144 324.48 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 324 0.48 0.96 re f 180 324.48 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 324 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 324.48 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 324 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 324.48 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 324 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 324.48 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 324 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 285.6 0.48 38.4 re f BT 78.24 279.36 TD ( ) Tj 15.36 -11.52 TD (CS) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (L) Tj 7.2 0 TD ( ) Tj 27.84 11.52 TD ( ) Tj 8.64 -12.96 TD /F4 12 Tf 0.24 Tc (_) Tj 6.24 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tc ( ) Tj -10.08 -13.44 TD (SD) Tj 14.4 0 TD ( ) Tj 16.8 26.4 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (68.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (23.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 31.68 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 20.16 -11.52 TD (38.1) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (15.5) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 32.16 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 13.92 -11.52 TD (99.17) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj -32.64 -13.92 TD (2.89) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj 29.76 25.44 TD ( ) Tj 22.56 -11.52 TD (48.7) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -28.8 -13.92 TD (13.4) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET 71.52 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 72 285.12 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 144 285.12 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 180 285.12 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 261.12 285.12 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 342.24 285.12 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 417.6 285.12 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 284.64 0.48 0.96 re f 71.52 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 71.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 71.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 72 245.76 71.52 0.48 re f 143.52 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 143.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 144 245.76 35.52 0.48 re f 179.52 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 179.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 180 245.76 80.64 0.48 re f 260.64 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 260.64 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 261.12 245.76 80.64 0.48 re f 341.76 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 341.76 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 342.24 245.76 74.88 0.48 re f 417.12 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 417.12 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 417.6 245.76 85.92 0.48 re f 503.52 246.24 0.48 38.4 re f 503.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f 503.52 245.76 0.48 0.48 re f BT 72 235.2 TD ( ) Tj 36 -27.84 TD (The mean percent scores for all ) Tj 230.4 0 TD (tasks are lower in the ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (present study compared to the other versions of the MAPA for ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (both third and fifth graders. The lower scores in PP and DD ) Tj T* (can be explained by increased difficulty of the tests \(four ) Tj T* (series tones for PP and digit triplets for DD\). The ) Tj 374.4 0 TD (lower ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (scores in CS can be explained by the change in instructions ) Tj ET endstream endobj 146 0 obj 12541 endobj 147 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 148 0 obj<> endobj 149 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (43) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (which ask for both sentences to be repeated instead of one. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (The Beta III mSAAT is different from the Beta I version, ) Tj T* (which would explain some of the changes. The Beta II mSAAT ) Tj T* (is the same te) Tj 100.8 0 TD (st. However, the sample size for the Beta II ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (MAPA data was low and only contained 12 subjects.) Tj 352.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (The results from Table 10 indicate that the ceiling ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (effect was clearly not occurring on any of the original ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tasks with the Beta III MAPA. The current scores, whi) Tj 381.6 0 TD (le ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (lower than the other versions, are still considered ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (reasonable for these age groups.) Tj 230.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 150 0 obj 993 endobj 151 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 152 0 obj<>stream BT 72 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 180 0 TD (CHAPTER IV) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -252 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj T* ( ) Tj 133.44 0 TD (Summary and Conclusions) Tj 165.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -299.04 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD (The purpose of this study was to determine 1\) if forms ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (A and B of the Beta III MAPA were equivalent and 2\) if the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (modification) Tj 86.4 0 TD (s made to some of the tasks were sufficient to ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (overcome the ceiling effect and produce reasonable means and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (standard deviations for the Beta III version of the MAPA.) Tj 410.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (Means, standard deviations, Pearson correlations, and ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (t) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tests were used to examine the sco) Tj 244.8 0 TD (res for the first ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (question. First, the individual scores of mSAAT, SINCA, DD, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (CS, PP, and DP were examined. The scores as groups of ) Tj T* (monaural, binaural, and temporal tasks as well as a ) Tj T* (composite score were also examined for the entire test.) Tj 396 0 TD ( ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (When looked at ) Tj 108 0 TD (individually, the two forms for the ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (individual ear monaural tasks mSAAT and SINCA do not ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (correlate in a significant manner. However, when the ears ) Tj T* (are combined, the forms are more strongly related and ) Tj T* (statistically significant \(.37 to .40\). The results of ) Tj 396 0 TD (the ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (paired t) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tests show that the mean differences on form A and ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (B scores are not significant, either when looked at by ear ) Tj ET endstream endobj 153 0 obj 1823 endobj 154 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 155 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (45) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (or when combined. As combined monaural tasks, the msAAT and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the SINCA show a correlation of .46, which is moderate in ) Tj T* (magnitude, but ) Tj 108 0 TD (statistically significant. Thus, these forms ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (are passably acceptable to use as equivalent forms. However, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (to improve the correlations, the SINCA task will be modified ) Tj T* (and studied through future research. This future research ) Tj T* (will determine final form equiv) Tj 223.2 0 TD (alency in the monaural tasks.) Tj 208.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (The binaural tasks, CS and DD, show correlations ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (between .69) Tj 79.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (.78 for forms A and B. This shows an acceptable ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (relationship between forms for both tasks. The paired t) Tj 396 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (showed significant mean differences between the scores o) Tj 403.2 0 TD (n DD ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (for form A and B. However, these differences seem to be ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (attributable to learning that occurs on this task. As ) Tj T* (combined binaural tasks the correlation between forms is ) Tj T* (.81. This shows that on binaural tasks, the forms are highly ) Tj T* (related and exhibit goo) Tj 165.6 0 TD (d equivalency. The t) Tj 144 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test for the ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (combined binaural tasks shows a significant difference in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (means, but this is again probably due to the learning on DD ) Tj T* (as described.) Tj 93.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD (The temporal tasks, PP and DP, show the highest ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (correlations between forms at .89 and .85) Tj 295.2 0 TD ( respectively. This ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (shows a strong relationship and good equivalency between ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (forms. The DP does show a difference between mean scores ) Tj ET endstream endobj 156 0 obj 2115 endobj 157 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 158 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (46) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (that is significant at the .01 level \(p=0.002\). The reason ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (for this is not well understood since the majority of the ) Tj T* (items) Tj 36 0 TD ( between form A and B are the same and only presented ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (in a different randomized order. The percent mean scores ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (range from about 57) Tj 136.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (66% on the PP task and 37) Tj 180 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (62% on the DP ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (tasks. Thus the ceiling effect is clearly not occurring in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (this sample. For the PP ta) Tj 187.2 0 TD (sk, it was necessary to score ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (reversals as correct for the younger subjects in the sample ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(8) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9 year) Tj 43.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (olds\) in order to establish tentative norms. ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (Reversed items on the DP tasks were not scored as correct.) Tj 417.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (A combined temporal task score was found using the P) Tj 374.4 0 TD (P ) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (and the experimental task, Quick Tap, as suggested by a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (companion study. The correlation between forms was .90, ) Tj T* (which shows a high relationship and good equivalency. In ) Tj T* (addition, the difference between mean scores was not ) Tj T* (significant \(p=0.727\). ) Tj 165.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (These fi) Tj 57.6 0 TD (ndings show that correlation between forms is ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (best on binaural and temporal tasks with some mean ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (differences on forms A and B scores which are probably ) Tj T* (attributable to a learning effect. Therefore, reasonably ) Tj T* (good form equivalency was found. The monaural t) Tj 338.4 0 TD (asks show the ) Tj -338.4 -27.84 TD (lowest level of significant correlations between forms. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (However, work is being done on at least one monaural task to ) Tj ET endstream endobj 159 0 obj 2151 endobj 160 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 161 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (47) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (improve future correlations. For now, all tests on both ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (forms demonstrate at least some measures of equivalency. ) Tj T* (Future resea) Tj 86.4 0 TD (rch will determine if changes to monaural tasks ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (will improve correlations and form equivalencies.) Tj 352.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 162 0 obj 528 endobj 163 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 164 0 obj<>stream BT 72 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw ( ) Tj 180 0 TD (APPENDIX A) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 155.04 0 TD (Literature Review) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -277.44 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 0 -13.92 TD ( ) Tj 36 -13.92 TD (In recent years, many have promoted the necessity of ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (having good screening tools and diagnostic measures for APD. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (In order ) Tj 64.8 0 TD (to achieve this, the instruments used to screen and ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (diagnose APD should have good validity and reliability. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (work Schow and Domitz \(2000\) did on the original MAPA, with ) Tj T* (factor analysis results on four behavioral tests, showed ) Tj T* (that the MAPA yields a reas) Tj 194.4 0 TD (onable three or four factor ) Tj -194.4 -27.84 TD (structure for measuring APDs. With the two forms of the Beta ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (III MAPA, it is important to re) Tj 223.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (establish the validity and ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (reliability. Cacace and McFarland \(1995\) encouraged ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (researchers to give the necessary attention to test ) Tj T* (reli) Tj 28.8 0 TD (ability and to change factors that have resulted in poor ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (reliability in past APD tests. This chapter will include a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (discussion of test equivalency, and factor analysis. It will ) Tj T* (also give a description of the MAPA tests as well as the ) Tj T* (changes made to the Be) Tj 158.4 0 TD (ta III MAPA. Finally, it will discuss ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (other tests and protocols currently being used or ) Tj ET endstream endobj 165 0 obj 1673 endobj 166 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 167 0 obj<> endobj 168 0 obj<>stream BT 108 636.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 0 -13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (researched.) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD ( ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Test equivalency) Tj 115.2 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD (Equivalent or alternate forms of tests are used for two ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (main purposes. One purpose is to show test reliability. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Alternate test forms show) Tj 180 0 TD ( equivalence and reliability when ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (the two forms show similar mean performance by the group of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (subjects and high correlation between the two forms. ) Tj T* (Anastasi \(1982\) states that \223The correlation between the ) Tj T* (scores obtained on the two forms represents the reli) Tj 374.4 0 TD (ability ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (coefficient of the test\224 \(p. 111\). Anastasi \(1982\) also ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (urges that the two forms are indeed parallel in terms of ) Tj T* (difficulty, format, time, etc. When the forms are found to ) Tj T* (be equivalent and highly correlated, then alternate forms ) Tj T* (are useful for ma) Tj 122.4 0 TD (ny test purposes.) Tj 122.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (Many testing situations require alternate forms. For ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (example, if a test needs to be re) Tj 237.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (administered after a short ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (time interval, information on specific test items will not ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (be available. Alternate forms can also be used in follow) Tj 403.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (up ) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (studi) Tj 36 0 TD (es or to measure subject learning. In the case of the ) Tj ET endstream endobj 169 0 obj 1658 endobj 170 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 171 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (50) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (Beta III MAPA, the two forms can be useful to measure the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (progress in the treatment of APDs.) Tj 244.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (\223Ideally, alternate forms of a test are interchangeable ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (in use\224 \(American Psychological Association, 1985, p) Tj 374.4 0 TD (. 31\). ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (In this situation, it would not matter whether form A or B ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (is used. In its final form, the alternate forms of the MAPA ) Tj T* (should be able to be used interchangeably. ) Tj 309.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Factor analysis) Tj 108 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (Factor analysis is another tool that can be used to ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (help define precis) Tj 129.6 0 TD (e areas within APD. According to Schow and ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (Chermak \(1999\), \223In addition to testing models of central ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (auditory processing and CAPD to establish their construct ) Tj T* (validity, factor analysis of central auditory performance ) Tj T* (scores provides an important method by ) Tj 280.8 0 TD (which we can group ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (the underlying deficits that purportedly comprise CAPD\224 \(p. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (141\).) Tj 36 0 TD ( ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (In an attempt to provide a reliable screening tool with ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (factor analysis results, Domitz and Schow \(2000\), ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (administered a battery of four behavioral APD tests to ) Tj T* (school) Tj 43.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ag) Tj 14.4 0 TD (ed children. The test battery was selected ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (following Musiek & Chermak\222s 1994 suggestions. The test ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (battery was named the Multiple Auditory Processing ) Tj ET endstream endobj 172 0 obj 1948 endobj 173 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 174 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (51) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (Assessment \(MAPA\) and included the following: monaural ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Selective Auditory Attention Test \(mSAAT\), Pitch Pa) Tj 367.2 0 TD (tterns ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (\(PP\), Dichotic Digits \(DD\), and Competing Sentences \(CS\). ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Factor analysis on the four tests showed that they loaded ) Tj T* (into four distinct categories, which Domitz and Schow named. ) Tj T* (The mSAAT scores loaded into one factor which they called ) Tj T* (monaural separ) Tj 100.8 0 TD (ation/closure \(MSC\). The PP scores loaded into ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (another factor which was called auditory pattern/temporal ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (ordering \(APTO\). The loading factor for the DD scores ) Tj T* (involved binaural integration \(BI\). Finally, the CS scores ) Tj T* (constituted tasks requiring binaural s) Tj 273.6 0 TD (eparation \(BS\). Domitz ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (and Schow determined that three of the most common and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (important ASHA 1996 test categories were represented in this ) Tj T* (test battery \(binaural dichotic tasks, monaural tasks, and ) Tj T* (temporal tasks\). Binaural interaction, speech recognition,) Tj 417.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -417.6 -27.84 TD (and localization/lateralization were within the ASHA ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (categories but not represented in the MAPA. Nevertheless, ) Tj T* (they felt that the MAPA was an appropriate test according to ) Tj T* (the 1996 ASHA guidelines and more work would be needed to ) Tj T* (demonstrate the need to t) Tj 180 0 TD (est in the last three areas.) Tj 201.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (MAPA concerns) Tj 93.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD (While much work has been done on the MAPA, McFarland ) Tj ET endstream endobj 175 0 obj 1938 endobj 176 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 177 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (52) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (and Cacace \(2002\) stated concerns with the MAPA that they ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (felt required further research. One area is to determine if ) Tj T* (the MAPA actually tests distinct aspects ) Tj 295.2 0 TD (of CAP as suggested ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (by the factor analysis. They mentioned the research done by ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Domitz and Schow \(2000\), on the factors shown in the SCAN as ) Tj T* (compared to the MAPA. Domitz and Schow \(2002\) reported that ) Tj T* (the SCAN showed two loading factors in contrast to the ) Tj 396 0 TD (one ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (factor reported by Amos and Humes \(1998\). Schow et al. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(2002\) agreed that further research needs to be done on the ) Tj T* (MAPA in the area of factor analysis. The purpose of the ) Tj T* (further research also includes gathering tasks for the MAPA ) Tj T* (battery that test as ) Tj 151.2 0 TD (many areas as possible that are ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (described in the 1996 ASHA document. Schow et al. mentioned ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the desire to have a battery with a number of tests for each ) Tj T* (of the underlying traits of auditory processing. ) Tj 352.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (McFarland and Cacace \(2002\) also questioned the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (audit) Tj 36 0 TD (ory) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (only tasks on the MAPA. They felt that this limited ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (the ability to distinguish auditory) Tj 252 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (specific effects from ) Tj -259.2 -27.84 TD (more general aspects, such as cognition. They felt that if ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the tasks truly do measure auditory only aspects, these ) Tj T* (tasks should not be able to) Tj 194.4 0 TD ( predict performance on other ) Tj -194.4 -27.84 TD (sensory tasks. In an earlier article Cacace and McFarland ) Tj ET endstream endobj 178 0 obj 2022 endobj 179 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 180 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (53) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (\(1998\) stated that \223the primary deficit with CAPD should be ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (manifested in tasks requiring the processing of acoustic ) Tj T* (information, and should not be apparent when simila) Tj 367.2 0 TD (r types ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (of information are processed in other sensory modalities\224 ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(p. 356\). Schow et al. pointed out that they were cautious ) Tj T* (to only use auditory tasks rather than involving the other ) Tj T* (senses, such as vision. However, they invited further ) Tj T* (research to be don) Tj 129.6 0 TD (e in this area.) Tj 108 0 TD ( ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Test Description) Tj 115.2 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -79.2 -27.84 TD (The Beta III MAPA contains four tests from the original ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (MAPA. The four tests are the mSAAT, a monaural task, DD and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (CS, binaural tasks, and PP, a temporal task. The final ) Tj T* (version of the MAPA will eventually contain at leas) Tj 367.2 0 TD (t two ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (tasks in each of the monaural, binaural, and temporal areas. ) Tj 439.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (The Selective Auditory Attention Task \(SAAT\) was a ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (binaural test developed by Cherry in 1980. The test requires ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the individual to listen for the primary stimuli \(words ) Tj T* (selected from the Wo) Tj 144 0 TD (rd Intelligibility by Picture ) Tj -144 -27.84 TD (Identification or WIPI list\) which are embedded in competing ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (background noise. The earlier MAPA and the Beta III MAPA use ) Tj T* (a monaural version of this test with both the stimulus and ) Tj T* (the competing noise going to the same ear. Th) Tj 324 0 TD (us, in these ) Tj ET endstream endobj 181 0 obj 1947 endobj 182 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 183 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (54) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (test batteries, the test is referred to as mSAAT. The mSAAT ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (contains 25 items per ear. The test time, including ) Tj T* (instructions, is approximately three minutes for each ear ) Tj T* (for a total of six minutes.) Tj 194.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (The Pitch Pattern test \(PP\) introduced by Pi) Tj 316.8 0 TD (nhiero in ) Tj -352.8 -27.84 TD (1977, randomly introduces high and low pitch qualities in a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (three) Tj 36 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (tone series which must be identified. Willeford and ) Tj -43.2 -27.84 TD (Burleigh \(1985\) reported that the test allowed multiple ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (response modes. The subjects could verbalize, hum, sing, or ) Tj T* (manually poi) Tj 86.4 0 TD (nt \(high or low\) to make their responses. The ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (current protocol also allows this multiple response mode. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (This is not stated explicitly in the instructions recorded ) Tj T* (on the CD as modeling different response modes might only ) Tj T* (confuse some of the children. Inste) Tj 252 0 TD (ad, the instructions were ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (kept simple and all kinds of responses were allowed. It was ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (found that some of the children would naturally sing their ) Tj T* (answers. Later testing can explore humming or singing if ) Tj T* (necessary. The changes in the PP task for the Beta III) Tj 388.8 0 TD ( MAPA ) Tj -388.8 -27.84 TD (will be discussed in the next section.) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (The Dichotic Digits test \(DD\) introduced by Musiek in ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (1983, presents four numbers simultaneously to the listener, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (two in each ear. The subject is required to repeat all four ) Tj ET endstream endobj 184 0 obj 1953 endobj 185 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 186 0 obj<> endobj 187 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (55) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (numbers aloud in a free recall manner) Tj 266.4 0 TD (. The order the numbers ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (were repeated was not taken into account when scoring DD. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (The Beta III MAPA has presentation changes as well as a ) Tj T* (revised scoring procedure for DD. These changes will be ) Tj T* (discussed in the next section. ) Tj 223.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (The Willeford Competing Senten) Tj 216 0 TD (ces test \(CS\) presents ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (two sentences, one to the right ear and one to the left ear, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (concurrently. The subjects only repeated the left or right ) Tj T* (ear sentence as directed while ignoring the opposing ear. ) Tj T* (There have been instruction changes in the Beta III MAP) Tj 396 0 TD (A for ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (the CS task that will be discussed in the following section.) Tj 432 0 TD ( ) Tj -432 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Changes to the MAPA) Tj 136.8 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (The revised version of the MAPA \(Beta III MAPA\) has ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (been developed and recorded on compact disc \(CD\) by Auditec ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (of St. Louis. The revised MAPA includes test information) Tj 403.2 0 TD ( for ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (a form A and form B version of the test. As mentioned, the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (current MAPA has the same tests as the earlier version. Some ) Tj T* (changes have been made to make the tasks more difficult in ) Tj T* (order to avoid the ceiling effect that was occurring with ) Tj T* (the MAPA and o) Tj 100.8 0 TD (ther APD tests. For example, Neijenhuis, ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (Stollman, Snik, and Broek \(2001\) reported on a battery of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (tests that included pitch and duration pattern tests. They ) Tj ET endstream endobj 188 0 obj 1970 endobj 189 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 190 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (56) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (also found the ceiling effect was occurring on these tests, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (depending on the age of the subjects.) Tj 266.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (There are variations on three of the Beta III MAPA ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (tasks. One variation is on the CS task. In his early work on ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (competing sentences, Willeford \(1978\) mentioned the ) Tj T* (possibility of testing the patients\222 ability to repeat both ) Tj T* (sentences. He said that in this ) Tj 230.4 0 TD (case, both sentences should ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (be presented at the same testing level of 50 dB HL. He ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (reported that normal adult subjects should be able to do ) Tj T* (this task easily. The Beta III MAPA, following this advice, ) Tj T* (required the subjects to listen to the two sentences ) Tj T* (pre) Tj 21.6 0 TD (sented simultaneously in the left and right ears and ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (repeat both sentences. They were directed to repeat either ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the right or the left ear first \(Chermak, personal ) Tj T* (communication, March 5, 2003\). In the Beta III MAPA, which ) Tj T* (included 15 sentences for each ear) Tj 244.8 0 TD (, the instruction and test ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (time was approximately three minutes for each ear for a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (total of six minutes.) Tj 151.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -115.2 -27.84 TD (The dichotic digits task has been modified to present ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (number triplets in each ear instead of two numbers. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (subjects were directed to repeat items f) Tj 288 0 TD (rom the right ear ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (first for ten items and from the left ear first for the ) Tj ET endstream endobj 191 0 obj 1885 endobj 192 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 193 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (57) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (other ten items as recommended by Moncrieff and Musiek ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (\(2002\). They recommended the directed response mode because ) Tj T* (it would control attentional strategies and might provide ) Tj T* (informati) Tj 64.8 0 TD (on about laterality. This will be discussed in more ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (detail in the section containing results from other test ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (batteries. Scoring for DD was done in two ways in the ) Tj T* (current research. The first way was a total score for all ) Tj T* (correct numbers in a free recall si) Tj 252 0 TD (tuation. The other way ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (provided a score for the right and left ear items repeated ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (first as directed. Thus, the order that the subjects ) Tj T* (repeated the numbers was taken into consideration in the ) Tj T* (alternate scoring procedure. In the Beta III MAPA, this task ) Tj T* (too) Tj 21.6 0 TD (k approximately four minutes.) Tj 208.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -194.4 -27.84 TD (The final task variation was with the PP task. The main ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (difference was that four tones of high and low pitches ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (intermixed were presented instead of three tones to make the ) Tj T* (test more difficult. In the original MAPA, the scorin) Tj 381.6 0 TD (g for ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (PP allowed exact reversals, such as high) Tj 288 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (low) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (high in the ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (place of low) Tj 86.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (high) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (low to be scored as correct. The scoring ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (of the PP task was initially changed to avoid the ceiling ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (effect. In this change, reversals of the tones were not ) Tj T* (scored as correct in) Tj 144 0 TD ( the Beta III MAPA. Later, when ) Tj ET endstream endobj 194 0 obj 2027 endobj 195 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 196 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (58) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (examining the results, it was found that the scores for the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (younger children were very low. The scoring was modified to ) Tj T* (count reversals as correct. This improved the scores, at ) Tj T* (least for the 8) Tj 108 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (9 year olds. Currently, reversa) Tj 223.2 0 TD (ls will be ) Tj -338.4 -27.84 TD (scored as correct, at least for the younger children. The ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (final PP change is that there are now twenty total PP tasks ) Tj T* (given binaurally instead of the thirty items used previously ) Tj T* (for each ear. Statistical analysis was done on the data ) Tj T* (gathered b) Tj 72 0 TD (y Domitz and Schow \(1997\) with regard to the ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (number of pitch pattern items needed. The analysis showed ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (that each item in the list was equivalent to any other item ) Tj T* (in terms of difficulty. The correlation between 15 and 30 ) Tj T* (tasks was .92. The correlation betw) Tj 252 0 TD (een 20 and 30 tasks was ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (.96. Thus, the results showed that twenty items were ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (sufficient to provide a reasonably valid score. The test and ) Tj T* (instruction time for this task on the Beta III MAPA was ) Tj T* (approximately four minutes.) Tj 194.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -194.4 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Experimental tests) Tj 129.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (There were fou) Tj 100.8 0 TD (r experimental tests recorded on the CD ) Tj -136.8 -27.84 TD (of the Beta III MAPA that were examined in detail by a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (companion study. Two of these tests, the Speech in Noise for ) Tj T* (Children and Adults \(SINCA\) and duration patterns \(DP\) have ) Tj ET endstream endobj 197 0 obj 1911 endobj 198 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 199 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (59) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (a form A and B. Thus, their means, stand) Tj 288 0 TD (ard deviations, and ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (correlations were examined in this study. A description of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (these tests follows.) Tj 144 0 TD ( ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (The SINCA is a monaural task given to the right and ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (left ears. There are 24 total words to be repeated, which ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (includes the first four words that were eventu) Tj 331.2 0 TD (ally found to ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (be better when not scored, but used as practice items. There ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (is a four) Tj 64.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (speaker babble in the background that gets ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (progressively louder by 4 dB after each set of four words. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Thus, the practice words are at +20 dB compared to the four ) Tj T* (speaker b) Tj 64.8 0 TD (abble. For the last four words at the end of the ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (task, the babble and signal words are at the same level. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Scoring was completed by taking the total number right out ) Tj T* (of 20 \(excluding the practice items\) and subtracting this ) Tj T* (number from 18 to get the signal) Tj 230.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (to) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (noise ratio \(SNR\). ) Tj 136.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (A variation of this strategy was used in the QuickSIN, ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (a speech) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (in) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (noise test developed by Etymotic Research. In ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (the QuickSIN, the SNR loss is found, which compares the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (subjects\222 performance in noise to individuals with normal ) Tj T* (heari) Tj 36 0 TD (ng. People with normal hearing require a +2 dB signal) Tj 381.6 0 TD (-) Tj -417.6 -27.84 TD (to) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (noise ratio to correctly identify 50% of the key words in ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (the QuickSIN sentences \(QuickSIN test manual\). The SINCA was ) Tj ET endstream endobj 200 0 obj 2180 endobj 201 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 202 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (60) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (looking for a SNR score, thus the 2 dB was subtracted from ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the 20 possible items) Tj 151.2 0 TD (, resulting in the number 18 which was ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (used to find the SNR. In the Beta III MAPA, it took ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (approximately three) Tj 136.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (and) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (a) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (half minutes to test both ears.) Tj 223.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (The DP task is very similar to the PP task in format. ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (Each item included a series of four tones that varied) Tj 381.6 0 TD ( in ) Tj -381.6 -27.84 TD (their presentation lengths \(short or long\). There were ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (twenty total items presented binaurally. The subjects were ) Tj T* (required to correctly identify the pattern. Reversals for DP ) Tj T* (were not scored as correct for any age group. For the Beta ) Tj T* (III MAPA, this tas) Tj 129.6 0 TD (k took approximately four) Tj 180 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (and) Tj 21.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (a) Tj 7.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (half ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (minutes.) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Other test batteries) Tj 144 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (Neijenhuis, Stollman, Snik, and Broek \(2001\) ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (administered a battery of seven auditory tests to 28 adults ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (with normal hearing. Their purpose was to find tests ) Tj T* (appropriate for adults that co) Tj 216 0 TD (uld also be modified for ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (testing older children. The battery included words in noise, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (filtered speech, binaural fusion, sentences in noise, ) Tj T* (dichotic digits, frequency and duration patterns, and ) Tj T* (backward masking. The dichotic digits task used presented ) Tj T* (thre) Tj 28.8 0 TD (e numbers to each ear. The subjects were not directed to ) Tj ET endstream endobj 203 0 obj 2099 endobj 204 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 205 0 obj<> endobj 206 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (61) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (repeat a certain ear first, rather they were allowed free ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (recall of the items. The scoring was done for each ear and ) Tj T* (for both ears. The frequency and duration patterns tasks ) Tj T* (used combinations of thre) Tj 180 0 TD (e tones or three durations. In ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (addition to the behavioral tests, a 30) Tj 273.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (item questionnaire on ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (everyday listening situations was administered. The subjects ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (reported their responses on the frequency of occurrence of ) Tj T* (the behaviors on a 4) Tj 144 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (point scale.) Tj 86.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (The result) Tj 72 0 TD (s showed that the ceiling effect was ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (occurring on the frequency and duration pattern tests with ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (their adult subjects. The median scores were 98% for ) Tj T* (frequency and 100% for duration. Scores at the 10) Tj 352.8 5.28 TD /F1 7.2 Tf (th) Tj 8.64 -5.28 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -361.44 -27.84 TD (percentile showed 89% for frequency and 90% for duratio) Tj 396 0 TD (n. ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (The dichotic digits task showed that scores were higher in ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the right ear than in the left ear. The median scores for ) Tj T* (this task were 83% in the right ear and 76% in the left ear, ) Tj T* (which is significantly different \(p<0.05\) \(2001\). This is ) Tj T* (the only test tha) Tj 122.4 0 TD (t showed differences between ears.) Tj 244.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (Neijenhuis, Snik, Priester, van Kordenoordt, and van ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (der Broak \(2002\) administered a test battery originally ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (intended for adults to a group of children and teenagers. Of ) Tj T* (interest were the results for 75 children \(ages 9) Tj 352.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (12\) on ) Tj ET endstream endobj 207 0 obj 2072 endobj 208 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 209 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (62) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (dichotic digits and pattern tests since this is a similar ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (age to the subject in this study. The dichotic digits were ) Tj T* (presented as number triplets to each ear in a free recall ) Tj T* (condition. The pattern tests included both pitch and ) Tj T* (duration. However, in) Tj 151.2 0 TD ( this study, series of three tones ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (instead of four were used. The dichotic digits showed a mean ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (percent score between 60) Tj 172.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (70% for this age group. When the ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (task was scored looking at the individual ear performance, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the right ear scores were significantly bet) Tj 309.6 0 TD (ter than the left ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (ear \(p<0.001\). The percent mean difference was 10% between ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (ears. The mean percent score for the pitch or frequency ) Tj T* (pattern test was between 80) Tj 194.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (90%. For the duration patterns ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (test, the mean percent score was slightly lower in the 70) Tj 410.4 0 TD (-) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (80% ra) Tj 43.2 0 TD (nge. The ceiling effect was present in this 9) Tj 324 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (12 age ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (group, especially in the frequency pattern test.) Tj 345.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (Moncrieff and Musiek \(2002\) administered three dichotic ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (listening tests to normal \(control subjects\) and dyslexic ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (11) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (old children based on reports \223t) Tj 230.4 0 TD (hat children with ) Tj -288 -27.84 TD (dyslexia, a language disorder that leads to reading ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difficulties perform poorly on dichotic listening tasks\224 \(p. ) Tj T* (429\). One of these dichotic tests included dichotic digits, ) Tj T* (using pairs. Both free recall and directed reporting ) Tj ET endstream endobj 210 0 obj 2143 endobj 211 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 212 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (63) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (conditions \() Tj 86.4 0 TD (right or left ear first\) were used. \223The ) Tj -86.4 -27.84 TD (directed response format was used in this study to explore ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (the effects of attentional bias in the free recall ) Tj T* (condition\224 and also to be able to compare this task to the ) Tj T* (directed response format used for competing wo) Tj 331.2 0 TD (rd tasks ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD (\(Moncrieff & Musiek, 2002, p. 433\).) Tj 252 0 TD ( ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (The overall results showed that the control subjects ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (performed better than the children with dyslexia. In the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (free recall condition, there were not significant ) Tj T* (differences in the scores between ears \(for both g) Tj 360 0 TD (roups of ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (children\) or between normal and dyslexic children. In the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (directed response mode, the normal children performed ) Tj T* (significantly better than the children with dyslexia; ) Tj T* (however, there were not significant ear differences. The ) Tj T* (children with dyslexia s) Tj 172.8 0 TD (howed a significant ear difference ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (as they performed better when directed to report the right ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (ear first. Moncrieff and Musiek also reported that the DD ) Tj T* (task using double digits might be too easy for 11) Tj 352.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (year) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (old ) Tj -396 -27.84 TD (children as scores in both groups of children) Tj 324 0 TD ( were at or ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (near the maximum performance level. Among their suggestions ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (was to use three or even four digit pairs. Another ) Tj T* (suggestions was to randomly present digit pairs of one, two, ) Tj ET endstream endobj 213 0 obj 1965 endobj 214 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 215 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (64) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (or three items so that the stimulus interval would be ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (uncertain to the l) Tj 129.6 0 TD (istener \(2002\).) Tj 108 0 TD ( ) Tj -201.6 -27.84 TD (Moncrieff and Musiek \(2002\) suggested that using a ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (directed response mode to control for attentional strategies ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (produced results that may be \223more reflective of hemispheric ) Tj T* (lateralization for language\224 \(p. 436\). They also suggested ) Tj T* (that wh) Tj 50.4 0 TD (ile this directed response mode would sacrifice ) Tj -50.4 -27.84 TD (information about attentional strategies used by the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (listener, it would provide \223more reliable laterality ) Tj T* (indices\224 \(p. 436\). Laterality is one of the ASHA recommended ) Tj T* (areas for testing in order to diagnose ch) Tj 295.2 0 TD (ildren with APD. ) Tj -295.2 -27.84 TD (With this in mind, Moncrieff and Musiek state that \223test ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (conditions that will produce the most valid measure of both ) Tj T* (direction and degree of lateralization are essential\224 ) Tj T* (\(p.436\).) Tj 57.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -57.6 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (SCAN) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C development) Tj 93.6 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -93.6 -27.84 TD (The SCAN, a test for auditory processing) Tj 288 0 TD ( disorders, was ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (developed by Robert Keith to test children ages 3) Tj 352.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11. It was ) Tj -360 -27.84 TD (originally published in 1986. The SCAN) Tj 273.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C is a revision of ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (this test. For the SCAN) Tj 165.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C, Keith modified his competing word ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (task based on an item) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (by) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (item analysis, added a competing ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (se) Tj 14.4 0 TD (ntences task, and gathered more normative data for ) Tj ET endstream endobj 216 0 obj 2134 endobj 217 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 218 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (65) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (children ages 5) Tj 108 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 \(Keith, 2000\). ) Tj 129.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (Keith described the SCAN) Tj 172.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C and some changes in a 2000 ) Tj -216 -27.84 TD (article. The SCAN) Tj 122.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C offers raw scores, which are converted ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (to standard scores, percentile ranks, and confidence ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (inte) Tj 28.8 0 TD (rvals. This standardization allows the scores to be ) Tj -28.8 -27.84 TD (compared to other standardized tests on the same population, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (be it language or intelligence tests. However, there were ) Tj T* (concerns with the original SCAN concerning test re) Tj 360 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (issues \(Amos & Humes, 1998\) a) Tj 208.8 0 TD (nd test performance by location ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (\(Emerson et al., 1997\). Additionally, Amos and Humes also ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (questioned some of the scoring methods.) Tj 280.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (The SCAN) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C consists of four subtests: filtered words ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (\(FW\), auditory figure) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ground \(AFG\), competing words \(CW\), ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (and competing ) Tj 100.8 0 TD (sentences \(CS\). The AFG task is somewhat ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (similar to the SINCA task on the Beta III MAPA as words are ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (presented in the presence of speaker babble. The CS task in ) Tj T* (the SCAN) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C is similar to the original MAPA where two ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (sentences are presented and the subject is) Tj 302.4 0 TD ( asked to repeat ) Tj -302.4 -27.84 TD (either the left or the right ear sentence.) Tj 302.4 0 TD ( ) Tj -266.4 -27.84 TD (The SCAN) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C was administered to 650 children between the ) Tj -100.8 -27.84 TD (ages of 5) Tj 64.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 years. Demographic information gathered ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD (included age, gender, race/ethnicity, geographic regions, ) Tj ET endstream endobj 219 0 obj 2302 endobj 220 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 221 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (66) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (and parent education level. I) Tj 208.8 0 TD (nformation was also collected ) Tj -208.8 -27.84 TD (from the school about children diagnosed or receiving ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (special services for ADD, ADHD, LD, speech or language ) Tj T* (problems, developmental delay, dyslexia, behavior ) Tj T* (disorder/emotionally disturbed, or any other health ) Tj T* (impairment. In ) Tj 108 0 TD (addition, gifted children were also ) Tj -108 -27.84 TD (recognized. To be included in the sample, children had good ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (speech intelligibility with few articulation errors, ) Tj T* (spoke/understood English proficiently, and passed a hearing ) Tj T* (screening at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz. Chil) Tj 338.4 0 TD (dren with ) Tj -338.4 -27.84 TD (severe disabilities were excluded from the study.) Tj 352.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (Keith reported that \223raw score means increased and the ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (standard deviations decreased with increasing age as ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (expected, reflecting maturation of the central auditory ) Tj T* (nervous system\224 \(2000, p. 441\).) Tj 223.2 0 TD ( Standard scores were ) Tj -223.2 -27.84 TD (developed, giving equal weighting to each subtest \(a ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (previous concern\). In addition, ear advantage scores were ) Tj T* (obtained. In general, a right ear advantage was shown, which ) Tj T* (reflects the \223left hemisphere dominance for language\224 \(2000, ) Tj T* (p) Tj 7.2 0 TD (. 442\). Keith also provided a cumulative prevalence of ear ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (advantage to determine if the ear advantage scores fall ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (within a normal range. Keith reported the subtest test) Tj 388.8 0 TD (-) Tj ET endstream endobj 222 0 obj 1917 endobj 223 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 224 0 obj<> endobj 225 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (67) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (retest reliabilities, with a mean testing interval of 6.5 ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (days, ranging from .67 to .7) Tj 201.6 0 TD (8 for the children 8) Tj 144 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (11 years of ) Tj -352.8 -27.84 TD (age. Keith also reported the correlation between subtests ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (for the SCAN and SCAN) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (C, which are FW=0.55, AFG=0.31, and ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (CW=0.72. To answer the question about test location, Keith ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (used a matched sample of 27 children tested in a) Tj 345.6 0 TD (n ) Tj -345.6 -27.84 TD (audiometric sound) Tj 122.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (proofed booth or in a quiet room. T t) Tj 266.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (test ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (showed no significant differences between the mean scores ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (for the subtests or composite standard scores.) Tj 331.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -331.2 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder) Tj 288 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (There has been much debate about APD and its ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (r) Tj 7.2 0 TD (elationship to ADHD \(attention deficit hyperactivity ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (disorder\). Chermack, Hall, and Musiek \(1999\) mentioned ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (research from one side that felt that APD and ADHD might ) Tj T* (reflect a single developmental disorder. They mentioned ) Tj T* (research on the other side that ref) Tj 252 0 TD (lected the possibility of ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (co) Tj 14.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (occurrence between APD and ADHD. While ADHD is a medical ) Tj -21.6 -27.84 TD (diagnosis and APD is an audiological diagnosis, Chermack, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Somers, and Seikel \(1998\), pointed out that they both share ) Tj T* (a number of common symptoms, including \223attention an) Tj 374.4 0 TD (d ) Tj -374.4 -27.84 TD (listening problems, maladaptive behavior, distractibility, ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (instruction) Tj 79.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (following difficulty, and increased time ) Tj ET endstream endobj 226 0 obj 2207 endobj 227 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 228 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (68) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (required to complete tasks\224 \(p. 78\). They also pointed out ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (that while ADHD was traditionally looked at as an attention ) Tj T* (disorder, it is now por) Tj 165.6 0 TD (trayed as \223a deficit in motivation ) Tj -165.6 -27.84 TD (and rule) Tj 57.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (governed self) Tj 93.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (control rather than an attention ) Tj -165.6 -27.84 TD (deficit\224 \(Chermack et al., 1998, p. 78\).) Tj 288 0 TD ( ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (Consequently, these researchers surveyed audiologists ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (and pediatricians on behaviors that reflect APD and/or ADHD. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (Their res) Tj 64.8 0 TD (ults showed that while there are common symptoms, ) Tj -64.8 -27.84 TD (the ranking of these symptoms differ with each diagnosis. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (For example, inattentive and distracted behavior were the ) Tj T* (only behaviors present for the diagnosis of children with ) Tj T* (both APD and ADHD at the level o) Tj 230.4 0 TD (f one standard deviation ) Tj -230.4 -27.84 TD (above the mean. However, with the diagnosis of ADHD, these ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (behaviors ranked as number one and two compared to six and ) Tj T* (seven on the ranking for APD. The first five items on the ) Tj T* (list for identifying behaviors for APD included the ) Tj T* (fol) Tj 21.6 0 TD (lowing as reported by Chermak et al., \(1998, p. 80\). ) Tj 381.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (11) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Difficulty hearing in background noise) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (12) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Difficulty following oral instructions) Tj 273.6 0 TD ( ) Tj -309.6 -27.84 TD (13) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Poor listening skills) Tj 151.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (14) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Academic difficulties) Tj 151.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -187.2 -27.84 TD (15) Tj 14.4 0 TD (.) Tj 7.2 0 TD /F3 12 Tf 0.024 Tw ( ) Tj 14.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (Poor auditory association skills) Tj 230.4 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 229 0 obj 2460 endobj 230 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 231 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (69) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 144 683.04 TD (These researchers felt it was significant that) Tj 331.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -367.2 -27.84 TD (behavioral scales, as judged by pediatricians and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (audiologists, should differentiate APD from ADHD in this ) Tj T* (manner. However, they were still unclear about the ) Tj T* (relationship between APD and the predominately inattentive ) Tj T* (type of ADHD \(ADHD) Tj 129.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (PI\), as the behavio) Tj 136.8 0 TD (rs are most similar to ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (each other.) Tj 79.2 0 TD ( ) Tj -43.2 -27.84 TD (In an expansion study to answer this question, another ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (survey was sent to pediatricians and audiologists asking ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (them to rank behaviors found in children with APD and ADHD) Tj 417.6 0 TD (-) Tj -417.6 -27.84 TD (PI by Chermak, Tucker, and Seikel \(2002\). The res) Tj 352.8 0 TD (ults showed ) Tj -352.8 -27.84 TD (six common behaviors in both disorders, which were \223academic ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (difficulties, distraction, poor listening skills, asking for ) Tj T* (things to be repeated, auditory divided attention deficit, ) Tj T* (and difficulty hearing in background/ambient noise\224 \(p. ) Tj T* (335\). T) Tj 50.4 0 TD (hey found nine behaviors that showed up only on one ) Tj -50.4 -27.84 TD (list \(APD or ADHD) Tj 122.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (PI\) that serve to distinguish or ) Tj -129.6 -27.84 TD (differentiate the disorders. Overall, they felt that the set ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (of behaviors that most highly characterize either APD or ) Tj T* (ADHD) Tj 28.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (PI were reasonably exclusive a) Tj 216 0 TD (s the four most ) Tj -252 -27.84 TD (characteristic behaviors \(asks for things to be repeated and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (poor listening skills for APD and inattentive and academic ) Tj ET endstream endobj 232 0 obj 2029 endobj 233 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 234 0 obj<>stream BT 36 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (70) Tj ET q 504 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 504 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 72 683.04 TD (difficulties for ADHD) Tj 151.2 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (PI\) were not similarly highly ranked ) Tj -158.4 -27.84 TD (on both lists \(Chermak et al., 2002\). They further mentioned ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (that pediatricians consider ADHD) Tj 230.4 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (PI to relate to cognitive ) Tj -237.6 -27.84 TD (problems while audiologists characterize APD as an auditory) Tj 424.8 0 TD (-) Tj -424.8 -27.84 TD (specific deficit. They suggested further research and ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (collaboration between professionals to ensure proper ) Tj T* (diagnosis.) Tj 72 0 TD ( ) Tj -72 -27.84 TD /F0 12 Tf (Electroacoustical m) Tj 136.8 0 TD (easures) Tj 50.4 0 TD /F1 12 Tf ( ) Tj -151.2 -27.84 TD (The Bruton conference recommended a minimal behavioral ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (test battery as well as the use of ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (electro/physiological/acoustic tests and neuroimaging ) Tj T* (studies. As mentioned, most of the research concerning APD ) Tj T* (has focused on behavioral tests. In 2001, Ji) Tj 316.8 0 TD (rsa summarized ) Tj -316.8 -27.84 TD (the information provided by three current ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (electrophysiological measures. The middle latency response ) Tj T* (\(MLR\) provides information about the maturation of the ) Tj T* (auditory system. However, it may be difficult to observe in ) Tj T* (children under the age of) Tj 180 0 TD ( ten and myogenic activity might ) Tj -180 -27.84 TD (also influence the results. The P300 has also shown ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (sensitivity to APD. However, the responses are highly ) Tj T* (variable and depend upon subject participation and attention ) Tj T* (to auditory tasks. Finally Jirsa \(2001\) reported that wh) Tj 403.2 0 TD (ile ) Tj -403.2 -27.84 TD (mismatched negativity \(MMN\) showed potential, \223the waveform ) Tj ET endstream endobj 235 0 obj 2022 endobj 236 0 obj<>/ProcSet 2 0 R>>/Type/Page>> endobj 237 0 obj<>stream BT 72 708.48 TD 0 0 0 rg /F2 12 Tf 0 Tc -0.12 Tw ( ) Tj 36 -12.48 TD ( ) Tj 417.6 13.44 TD /F1 12 Tf 0 Tw (71) Tj ET q 540 706.08 0.48 13.92 re h W n BT 540 709.44 TD ( ) Tj ET Q BT 108 683.04 TD (is difficult to identify and measure with accuracy\224 \(p. ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (156\). Thus it is not yet clinically useful. ) Tj 316.8 0 TD ( ) Tj -280.8 -27.84 TD (Jirsa \(2001\) suggested that for electrophysiological ) Tj -36 -27.84 TD (measures to be used routinely, \223An obj) Tj 273.6 0 TD (ective ) Tj -273.6 -27.84 TD (electrophysiologic measure is needed that is relatively ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (unaffected by myogenic activity, does not require active ) Tj T* (subject participation, can be completed relatively quickly ) Tj T* (without inducing patient fatigue, and can be readily ) Tj T* (identified with minimal ) Tj 172.8 0 TD (calculations\224 \(p. 156\). Jirsa ) Tj -172.8 -27.84 TD (reported on researched done with maximum length sequences) Tj 410.4 0 TD (-) Tj -410.4 -27.84 TD (auditory brainstem responses \(MLS) Tj 237.6 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ABR\). The MLS uses a ) Tj -244.8 -27.84 TD (higher stimulus rates/second than other measures currently ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (in use by using a pulse sequence stimulus. The final ) Tj T* (r) Tj 7.2 0 TD (esponse pattern is obtained through mathematical ) Tj -7.2 -27.84 TD (derivations. Jirsa examined children, ages 9) Tj 316.8 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (13, diagnosed ) Tj -324 -27.84 TD (and compared their responses to a control group. Jirsa ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (reported that there were statistically significant ) Tj T* (differences between the wave V latencies b) Tj 302.4 0 TD (etween each group, ) Tj -302.4 -27.84 TD (with the clinical group being longer. He suggested that the ) Tj 0 -27.84 TD (nature of the test would lead to information about subjects\222 ) Tj T* (temporal processing abilities. However, he cautions that ) Tj T* (results should be interpreted with caution as limited ) Tj T* (resea) Tj 36 0 TD (rch has been done so far on the MLS) Tj 252 0 TD (-) Tj 7.2 0 TD (ABR.) Tj 28.8 0 TD ( ) Tj ET endstream endobj 238 0 obj 2110 endobj 239 0 obj<> endobj 240 0 obj<> endobj 241 0 obj<> endobj 242 0 obj<> endobj 243 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 244 0 obj<> endobj 245 0 obj<> endobj 246 0 obj<> endobj 247 0 obj<> endobj 248 0 obj<> endobj 249 0 obj<> endobj 250 0 obj<> endobj 251 0 obj<>stream H|T˒0sdS 摪=@ȃCRG. ĖK MQG==zvI9IB0d"HN{z&9uE8dBmFu(cD8@A2+JH[逡S3QfS CiTک ^>@YVnagJ&GЈ[4GQ;; 7aҲ*e>[X,zpReC`ԩΟ 1 AwB FӾOxzf?{0Z0q#4Mp,9X7$6}کTj9J $KI+wnMW>#SOc:-,{@j1W!5Fiov6`SS"&کbf[KTZb&"f勘m.0ljUZjw)Q. gܨE1+c>Z?\ij#ڳ?+#;4X.uC@O%u@?;ٸ岵𸿱٥>T+6$yԳs ,1ð{ldW~L: endstream endobj 252 0 obj<> endobj 253 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 254 0 obj<>stream H|V]o6|Gu?Zw)€ZmT|,)+!P>ާ!&P%#?IRF㔲C/~?N=ApL$J&=+3 aFq48JS~;8>/k8L;Esw>dI ZleGKGx|>0d{EC?FB:J{UVF}QՎ֚\KMEkX}YKKuIY痬sOˮх*u,mMMU #l LFZ^+5ujۦP0QԵ\~)K4V-UU!`s gLIn/13$˒ˊ.#dn! w*VޜJ촑)\I6CSQ/MD:^^<*wNUbxTH I&?),=+嶢Z? ;8 n3GSKn^ꝆzX>B^oa|cY]G@ _pS ̄ S'V[`jMHH=a+Ŕ-oU/=@{&"Ts4w ܖMQ hYzcH:/6 $SDg 0NT {]AahhTU@1VALd'9{EG%'Q"§CeAd t%#eB~$x冷8X5ܔo"G7}/Hq.:F_1;|Q5X'0T'Ve=oKj[] Hw6:gC-ĩf+6 C?P~`6,iJ4I^yPyBY|42nZVE^S1NvOOhZ\}NCK`WKodvߪk\!@ڧ3SjXBgIȢS`; W(DuP-F6͑N'I\qI u9"vl1P3;J,?%N,/ʬг4ٰ9&0$!݇NƑջk`ɳ1?!-@uݲ+@ŷf(2젾(쳾ִܳ-<8Y_M endstream endobj 255 0 obj<> endobj 256 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 257 0 obj<>stream H]s@raR۴c'fez⪴]L߳,چxX<{΋ߦ3낱(E}ꥐnA U0NB^%6|)6nFl{-x*^̹\> endobj 259 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 260 0 obj<>stream HVn0}+pmc II=xm4})$_{!=JkvM1mICܙʵJ|H2)QYhttJz@3Fb#|lb*/?~ż!iZMHSW]4`Xa[OѲ;uI$ uP> endobj 262 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 263 0 obj<>stream HV]o0}WGkLk4ڃKܖBM?l JB |{9} p#9b,!?H$ 72syt\O'N'z]bF$̨ƘnGRXU( L( Q'Ixɗ9x?' ç(XOHN>/Oe')bM,E:nڀEPJUE0M;RղT^ \4XN`p\H6B`{GY~VP0 hOlşU%oj^3T+a}F5P*;I% 0:FMG6h~!7[[fEcIEŻtt\+}xDFy= h>$*a/]m+K2+KYcʜ? "z endstream endobj 264 0 obj<> endobj 265 0 obj<> endobj 266 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 267 0 obj<>stream HUˎ6+8 Zn՚6MT,-%~ZWu;6{\=.Ǡe ¯:E;r)"}pTv NIG9}i4sK&weO甫I ƥ S/}ui:++tEBbpK51UijFx D@UvQ_ƣwB(AUޅ=@l!~(ϱ@+StV4m+glC8^ݱh7 ه» A,,d75w }D(Mg8]wj y%XTKL+5{z_" (h%˃92,^<-RcUme Fn>:'%vTN0cɚ5zKΩydu9:*{>I7d6HƳ(H1#.=L)1t62z+F od\f']5 KF~ kwUDXɺq m\gJ[P[ɺJNVeY஽֓䀙*z84⋉cjŖthOoqkaU ͥtHoٯÚ\NF١Xmcױ1Bc5V^{o#7!i8tb'Gq7rq7ذAI$1oDvtZkf]Ā_$ڧA Ah:0fh/u_˻[jSE@+Xձ0x)|-sxw|Efѓ[ WV$Ԉsw *l2EaT]o$7\Ώ#_{O endstream endobj 268 0 obj<> endobj 269 0 obj<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/ExtGState<>>> endobj 270 0 obj<>stream HRKo0W1]).6`ȑ&B68*BC"屫&%Z*0!%P莣[)9",! Ͱ?! 4eYtEhvb`nOl .DQ77">fU|f.Tr~ͣ:`x{2 sm t61] 4<@ YlM9`vA24a)b̙e|_\ WL ^U@2:)`YW 3b906's E3;-۷Sw _Nst2+!\IT݇0'5ŠYн hğ^6BZ4h5rٖO ё1lqv*B)4Jh{ƓGYu1=蘽֐vY'`_ɿiev9˟Ev@ 5&]֍ endstream endobj 271 0 obj<>stream 2007-08-01T16:23:51Z LAURIE CONLIN'S MAPA THESIS - Microsoft Word 2007-08-03T14:19:45-06:00 2007-08-03T14:19:45-06:00 application/pdf Administrator LAURIE CONLIN'S MAPA THESIS Acrobat PDFWriter 5.0 for Windows NT uuid:754212a7-c73e-45e3-ba53-aa37343fbb52 uuid:2ceab7d5-377d-4cb1-92c9-1959df1f1ba7 endstream endobj xref 0 272 0000000000 00000 f 0000000016 00000 n 0000000258 00000 n 0000000284 00000 n 0000000347 00000 n 0000000460 00000 n 0000000581 00000 n 0000001638 00000 n 0000001883 00000 n 0000002933 00000 n 0000003169 00000 n 0000004985 00000 n 0000005006 00000 n 0000005123 00000 n 0000006181 00000 n 0000006420 00000 n 0000008367 00000 n 0000008388 00000 n 0000008514 00000 n 0000010682 00000 n 0000010703 00000 n 0000010820 00000 n 0000012825 00000 n 0000012846 00000 n 0000012963 00000 n 0000013680 00000 n 0000013700 00000 n 0000013827 00000 n 0000014881 00000 n 0000015113 00000 n 0000016364 00000 n 0000016385 00000 n 0000016510 00000 n 0000016612 00000 n 0000018358 00000 n 0000018379 00000 n 0000018495 00000 n 0000020324 00000 n 0000020345 00000 n 0000020461 00000 n 0000022585 00000 n 0000022606 00000 n 0000022732 00000 n 0000025307 00000 n 0000025328 00000 n 0000025453 00000 n 0000027423 00000 n 0000027444 00000 n 0000027560 00000 n 0000029566 00000 n 0000029587 00000 n 0000029703 00000 n 0000029805 00000 n 0000030123 00000 n 0000030143 00000 n 0000030269 00000 n 0000032226 00000 n 0000032247 00000 n 0000032372 00000 n 0000037569 00000 n 0000037590 00000 n 0000037706 00000 n 0000039822 00000 n 0000039843 00000 n 0000039959 00000 n 0000045310 00000 n 0000045331 00000 n 0000045447 00000 n 0000047451 00000 n 0000047472 00000 n 0000047597 00000 n 0000047699 00000 n 0000049793 00000 n 0000049814 00000 n 0000049930 00000 n 0000051916 00000 n 0000051937 00000 n 0000052053 00000 n 0000054171 00000 n 0000054192 00000 n 0000054308 00000 n 0000054949 00000 n 0000054969 00000 n 0000055095 00000 n 0000072767 00000 n 0000072789 00000 n 0000073824 00000 n 0000074060 00000 n 0000074176 00000 n 0000076336 00000 n 0000076357 00000 n 0000076473 00000 n 0000076578 00000 n 0000078707 00000 n 0000078728 00000 n 0000078854 00000 n 0000091009 00000 n 0000091031 00000 n 0000091157 00000 n 0000095764 00000 n 0000095785 00000 n 0000095903 00000 n 0000096752 00000 n 0000096773 00000 n 0000096910 00000 n 0000104775 00000 n 0000104797 00000 n 0000104915 00000 n 0000111152 00000 n 0000111174 00000 n 0000111293 00000 n 0000111402 00000 n 0000113431 00000 n 0000113453 00000 n 0000113572 00000 n 0000115638 00000 n 0000115660 00000 n 0000115788 00000 n 0000116943 00000 n 0000116965 00000 n 0000117093 00000 n 0000118530 00000 n 0000118552 00000 n 0000118671 00000 n 0000125078 00000 n 0000125100 00000 n 0000125228 00000 n 0000127378 00000 n 0000127400 00000 n 0000127519 00000 n 0000127628 00000 n 0000129564 00000 n 0000129586 00000 n 0000129705 00000 n 0000130644 00000 n 0000130665 00000 n 0000130794 00000 n 0000140123 00000 n 0000140145 00000 n 0000140264 00000 n 0000141887 00000 n 0000141909 00000 n 0000142028 00000 n 0000144050 00000 n 0000144072 00000 n 0000144201 00000 n 0000156797 00000 n 0000156820 00000 n 0000156939 00000 n 0000157048 00000 n 0000158096 00000 n 0000158117 00000 n 0000158236 00000 n 0000160114 00000 n 0000160136 00000 n 0000160255 00000 n 0000162425 00000 n 0000162447 00000 n 0000162566 00000 n 0000164772 00000 n 0000164794 00000 n 0000164913 00000 n 0000165496 00000 n 0000165517 00000 n 0000165636 00000 n 0000167364 00000 n 0000167386 00000 n 0000167514 00000 n 0000167623 00000 n 0000169336 00000 n 0000169358 00000 n 0000169486 00000 n 0000171489 00000 n 0000171511 00000 n 0000171639 00000 n 0000173632 00000 n 0000173654 00000 n 0000173773 00000 n 0000175850 00000 n 0000175872 00000 n 0000176000 00000 n 0000178002 00000 n 0000178024 00000 n 0000178143 00000 n 0000180151 00000 n 0000180173 00000 n 0000180301 00000 n 0000180410 00000 n 0000182435 00000 n 0000182457 00000 n 0000182576 00000 n 0000184516 00000 n 0000184538 00000 n 0000184657 00000 n 0000186739 00000 n 0000186761 00000 n 0000186889 00000 n 0000188855 00000 n 0000188877 00000 n 0000188996 00000 n 0000191231 00000 n 0000191253 00000 n 0000191381 00000 n 0000193535 00000 n 0000193557 00000 n 0000193676 00000 n 0000193785 00000 n 0000195912 00000 n 0000195934 00000 n 0000196053 00000 n 0000198251 00000 n 0000198273 00000 n 0000198392 00000 n 0000200412 00000 n 0000200434 00000 n 0000200562 00000 n 0000202751 00000 n 0000202773 00000 n 0000202892 00000 n 0000205249 00000 n 0000205271 00000 n 0000205390 00000 n 0000207362 00000 n 0000207384 00000 n 0000207512 00000 n 0000207613 00000 n 0000209875 00000 n 0000209897 00000 n 0000210026 00000 n 0000212541 00000 n 0000212563 00000 n 0000212682 00000 n 0000214766 00000 n 0000214788 00000 n 0000214916 00000 n 0000216993 00000 n 0000217015 00000 n 0000217134 00000 n 0000219299 00000 n 0000219321 00000 n 0000219433 00000 n 0000219543 00000 n 0000219628 00000 n 0000219759 00000 n 0000219870 00000 n 0000219947 00000 n 0000220281 00000 n 0000220515 00000 n 0000221028 00000 n 0000221271 00000 n 0000221732 00000 n 0000221954 00000 n 0000222808 00000 n 0000222939 00000 n 0000223050 00000 n 0000224410 00000 n 0000224541 00000 n 0000224640 00000 n 0000225481 00000 n 0000225612 00000 n 0000225711 00000 n 0000226395 00000 n 0000226526 00000 n 0000226637 00000 n 0000227438 00000 n 0000227534 00000 n 0000227665 00000 n 0000227752 00000 n 0000228776 00000 n 0000228907 00000 n 0000229006 00000 n 0000229531 00000 n trailer <]>> startxref 233243 %%EOF